Physics

"To know the quantum mechanical state of a system implies, in general, only statistical restrictions on the results of measurements. It seems interesting to ask if this statistical element be thought of as arising, as in classical statistical mechanics, because the states in question are averages over better defined states for which individually the results would be quite determined. These hypothetical 'dispersion free' states would be specified not only by the quantum mechanical state vector but also by additional 'hidden variables' - 'hidden' because if states with prescribed values of these variables could actually be prepared, quantum mechanics would be observably inadequate."

"The spectrum of gamma-radiation emitted by a highly excited nucleus can be calculated in two ways. In the first method the transition probability for gamma emission is related to the photon absorption cross-section by detailed balance. The second method relies on the fact that an excited hot nucleus has thermal fluctuations. In particular it has a fluctuating dipole moment which produces thermal radiation. The two methods are closely related and in both cases the spectrum of the radiation emitted is dominated by the giant dipole resonance. The equivalence of the detailed balance and thermal radiation theories can be demonstrated explicitly for a coupled oscillator model of the giant resonance."

"In contemplating the papers Einstein wrote in 1905, I often find myself wondering which of them is the most beautiful. It is a little like asking which of Beethoven’s symphonies is the most beautiful. My favorite, after years of studying them, is Einstein’s paper on the blackbody radiation. [...] Part of being a great scientist is to know—have an instinct for—the questions not to ask. Einstein did not try to derive the Wien law. He simply accepted it as an empirical fact and asked what it meant. By a virtuoso bit of reasoning involving statistical mechanics (of which he was a master, having independently invented the subject over a three-year period beginning in 1902), he was able to show that the statistical mechanics of the in the cavity was mathematically the same as that of a dilute gas of particles. As far as Einstein was concerned, this meant that this radiation was a dilute gas of particles—light quanta. But, and this was also characteristic, he took the argument a step further. He realized that if the energetic light quanta were to bombard, say, a metal surface, they would give up their energies in lump sums and thereby liberate electrons from the surface in a predictable way, something that is called the photoelectric effect. [...] In the first place, not many physicists were even interested in the subject of blackbody radiation for at least another decade. Kuhn has done a study that shows that until 1914 less than twenty authors a year published papers on the subject; in most years there were less than ten. Planck, who was interested, decided that Einstein’s paper was simply wrong."

"Newton and his theories were a step ahead of the technologies that would define his age. Thermodynamics, the grand theoretical vision of the nineteenth century, operated in the other direction with practice leading theory. The sweeping concepts of energy, heat, work and entropy, which thermodynamics (and its later form, statistical mechanics) would embrace, began first on the shop floor. Originally the domain of engineers, thermodynamics emerged from their engagement with machines. Only later did this study of heat and its transformation rise to the heights of abstract physics and, finally, to a new cosmological vision."

"Nuclei interact with the external environment through a number of different fields—electromagnetic, weak and hadronic. The collective excitations induced by these interactions are known as giant resonances. The best known example is the giant dipole resonance, which is stimulated when the electric field of an incident gamma ray exerts a force on the positively charged protons in a nucleus, moving them relative to the uncharged neutrons ... Other giant resonances that have been studied are the monopole, quadrupole and spin-isospin modes of oscillation. The spin-isospin mode involves charge-changing processes, in particular beta decay. The quadrupole and monopole giant resonances are most easily seen with fields that act equally on neutrons and protons, because in these modes the neutrons and protons oscillate in the same mode. The giant resonances are collective oscillations and the various modes of oscillation depend on specific aspects on the nuclear force to sustain them. In the monopole mode, the motion is radial and the frequency depends on the compressibility of the nucleus. In the dipole and spin-isospin resonances, the protons and neutrons are excited out of phase, and the proton-neutron interaction provide the restoring force."

"A powerful method to study the properties of a system is to subject it to a weak external perturbation and to examine its response. For the atomic nucleus subjected to the absorption of a photon or to the scattering of a particle (electron, proton, etc.) the response is ... a function of the energy and linear momentum transferred to the system. ... Up to about 10 MeV the nucleus responds through the excitation of relatively simple states often involving only one or a few particles. In the energy range between 10 and 30 MeV the system response exhibits broad resonances. These are the giant resonances ... Giant resonances correspond to a collective motion involving many if not all the particles in the nucleus. The occurrence of such a collective motion is a common feature of many-body quantum systems. In quantum-mechanical terms the resonance corresponds to a transition between the ground state and the collective state and its strength is described by a transition amplitude. Intuitively it is clear that the strength of the transition will depend on the basic properties of the system such as the number of particles participating in the response and the size of the system. This implies that the total transition strength should be limited by a sum rule which depends 'only' on ground-state properties. If the transition strength of an observed resonance exhausts a major part, say greater than 50%, of the corresponding sum rule we call it a giant resonance."

"The general problem of Celestial Mechanics consists in the determination of the relative motions of p bodies attracting one another according to the Newtonian law. This problem is not able to be solved directly: in order to deal with it, certain limitations must be made. ... Again, owing to the conditions under which the bodies of our solar system move, we are further able to divide the problem of p bodies into several others, each of which may be treated as a case of the problem of three particles, or, as it is generally called, the Problem of Three Bodies. The greater part of the Lunar Theory is a particular case of the Problem of Three Bodies; it involves the determination of the motion of the Moon relative to the Earth, when the mutual attraction of the Earth, Moon and Sun, considered as particles, are the only forces under consideration. When this has been found, the effects produced by the actions of the planets, the non-spherical forms of the bodies etc., can be be exhibited as small corrections to the coordinates."

"The idea that in some sense the ordinary proton and neutron might be solitons in a non-linear sigma model has a long history. The first suggestion was made by Skyrme more than twenty years ago ... David Finkelstein and Rubinstein showed that such objects could in principle be fermions ... in a paper that probably represented the first use of what would now be θ vacua in quantum field theory. A gauge invariant version was attempted by Faddeev ... Some relevant miracles are known to occur in two space-time dimensions ... ; there also exists a different mechanism by which solitons can be fermions ..."

"In Book I, Prop. LXVI of the first edition of Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica, Newton (1687) discussed the dynamical problem of three bodies in a general way, and then in Book III he asserted that the vagaries of the Moon's motion could be accounted for by the gravitational attraction of the Sun. He recognized that he needed to develop the theory further, and summarized his later results in The theory of the Moon's motion of 1702 (Cohen 1975). He continued to refine his treatment up to the publication of the second edition of Principia (Newton 1712), some sections of which differ greatly from the first edition. He made almost no further changes of his own in the third edition, but added a scholium by Machin (1726) on the motion of the nodes. The published account of the rotation of the apse line, much the same in all versions, was seriously wrong, but even before 1690 Newton had developed a somewhat more satisfactory treatment, with which, however, he remained dissatisfied and never published (Whiteside 1976). (Since this article was prepared, the new English translation of the Principia by Cohen and Whitman (1999) has appeared. It is a translation of the third edition of 1726, which differs significantly in a few places from the first and second editions, as will be indicated.)"

"A method is proposed to calculate quantum numbers on solitons in quantum field theory. The method is checked on previously known examples and, in a special model, by other methods. It is found, for example, that the fermion number on kinks in one dimension or on magnetic monopoles in three dimensions is, in general, a transcendental function of the coupling constant of the theories."

"...attributes may be maintained because of deformations in fields. Such conservation laws are called topological. Thus, it may happen that a knot in a set of field lines, called a soliton, cannot be smoothed out. As a result, the soliton is prevented from dissipating and behaves much like a particle. A classic example is a magnetic monopole, which has not been found in nature but shows up as twisted configurations in some field theories. In the traditional view, then, particles such as electrons and quarks (which carry Noether charges) are seen as fundamental, whereas particles such as magnetic monopoles (which carry topological charge) are derivative. In 1977, however, Claus Montonen, now at the Helsinki Institute of Physics in Finland, and David I. Olive, now at the University of Wales at Swansea, made a bold conjecture. Might there exist an alternative formulation of physics in which the roles of Noether charges (like electrical charge) and topological charges (like magnetic charge) are reversed? In such a “dual” picture, the magnetic monopoles would be the elementary objects, whereas the familiar particles—quarks, electrons and so on—would arise as solitons."

"While J. Scott Russell first observed solitons in water waves in Augst 1834, a full-fledged theory of solitons has only come of age in the last decade. This advance is due primarily in the discovery of a generalization of the , the . While this method can be used to solve exactly only a certain number of nonlinear equations, many of these are relevant to broad areas in physics."

"There are three essentially different types of lunar theory — that of de Pontécoulant, that of Delaunay, and that first developed by Hill, to which may perhaps be added that of Hansen as containing many features of more or less importance different from the others. That of de Pontécoulant and most of his predecessors consists in developing certain coordinates in periodic series of assumed form with the time or true anomaly as argument and determining the coefficients step by step as powers of the small parameters involved ; that of Delaunay consists in applying the method of the variation of parameters in the canonical form over and over in such a way as to remove the most important parts of the perturbative function ; that of Hill consists in finding very accurate particular solutions of the differential equations after the parts depending on the parallax of the sun, the eccentricity of the earth's orbit, and the latitude of the moon have been neglected, and then finding the deviations from this orbit due to general initial conditions and the neglected part of the perturbative function."

"The third model regards mind as an information processing system. This is the model of mind subscribed to by cognitive psychologists and also to some extent by the ego psychologists. Since an acquisition of information entails maximization of negative entropy and complexity, this model of mind assumes mind to be an open system."

"One could... safely declare that 'Physics... can be defined as that subject which treats of the transformation of energy.' The philosophical version of Herakleitos and Empedokles... a continual cycle of changes and exchanges, had... crystallized into a quantitative physical theory. But this... picture... was... incomplete. For... there was a second, equally general and fundamental element in Nature—a directional one. This had first been formulated in the 1820s by the Mozart of modern physics, Sadi Carnot. ...Carnot started with the question: What proportion of the in any system is 'available' as a means of producing ? ...Carnot demonstrated ...a one-hundred-per-cent-efficient engine could exploit only a fraction of the heat supplied to it... A 'super-efficient' machine which could exploit all the heat supplied, would be (as Carnot's mathematics proved) a machine... one could get out of it more energy than was supplied... In an ... physical changes could at most be perfectly reversible; [but] in normal cases they would result in the progressive... 'degradation' of mechanical energy by the production of unavailable heat. To characterize this... Clausius coined the word ... [T]he directional principle of Carnot and Clausias (which gave precise expression to Newton's insight that 'motion is more easily lost than got, and is continually upon the decrease') became the Second Law of Thermodynamics."

"It is my thesis that the physical functioning of the living individual and the operation of some of the newer communication machines are precisely parallel in their analogous attempts to control entropy through . Both of them have sensory receptors as one stage in their cycle of operation: that is, in both of them there exists a special apparatus for collecting information from the outer world at low energy levels, and for making it available in the operation of the individual or of the machine. In both cases these external messages are not taken neat, but through the internal transforming powers of the apparatus, whether it be alive or dead. The information is then turned into a new form available for the further stages of performance. In both the animal and the machine this performance is made to be effective on the outer world. In both of them, their performed action on the outer world, and not merely their intended action, is reported back to the central regulatory apparatus. This complex of behavior is ignored by the average man, and in particular does not play the role that it should in our habitual analysis of society; for just as individual physical responses may be seen from this point of view, so may the organic responses of society itself. I do not mean that the sociologist is unaware of the existence and complex nature of communications in society, but until recently he has tended to overlook the extent to which they are the cement which binds its fabric together."

"Entropy... we shall use this property in a specific and limited manner. ...The following are two implications of this property: 1. If a gas or vapor is compressed or expanded frictionlessly without adding or removing heat during the process, the entropy of the substance remains constant. 2. In the process implied in implication 1, the change in represents the amount of work per unit mass required by the compression or delivered by the expansion. Possibly the greatest possible use we shall have for entropy is to read lines of constant entropy on graphs in computing the work of compression in cycles."

"Prigogine was also concerned with the broader philosophical issues raised by his work. In the 19th century the discovery of the second law of thermodynamics, with its prediction of a relentless movement of the universe toward a state of maximum entropy, generated a pessimistic attitude about nature and science. Prigogine felt that his discovery of self-organizing systems constituted a more optimistic interpretation of the consequences of thermodynamics. In addition, his work led to a new view of the role of time in the physical sciences."

"Why is entropy at the beginning of time so low, and the entropy in a black hole so high? ...We ...don't know that the entropy was low ...We don't even know if there was a beginning of time. ...[E]ntropy ...is the physicist's measure of how messy things are, so my room ...tends to get higher and higher entropy, messier and messier. Why... eggs fall on the floor and break, and not... fly up and unbreak? People argued about that for a very long time until the shocking insight... that it was very low 13.4 billion years ago at the time when those... baby pictures of our universe were given off... the cosmic microwave background. ...So somehow, our flow of time towards greater messiness has something to do with our origin of our universe? That... we have learned. ...But now the question of why was that is something where many of my colleagues disagree violently... I have written a paper... which... has very little support... anyway, ...if you take seriously the idea of inflation and also this theory that the does not collapse, according to Hugh Everett, you can do some math and get an explanation... but... it's a wonderful mystery, and I'm open to all ideas... and black holes... is something else we know very little... ultimately where there are great truths yet to be discovered."

"Progress imposes not only new possibilities for the future but new restrictions. It seems almost as if progress itself and our fight against the increase of entropy intrinsically must end in the downhill path from which we are trying to escape."

"Entropy is the price of structure."

"After the invention of the steam-engine... by James Watt, the attention of engineers and of scientific men was directed to... its further improvement. ...Sadi Carnot, in 1824, published Réflexions sur la Puissance Motrice du Feu... [which] examined the relations between and the work done by heat used in an ideal engine, and by reducing the problem to its simplest form and avoiding...questions relating to details, he succeeded in establishing the conditions upon which the economical working of all heat-engines depends. ...Though the proof was invalid, the proposition remained true... Carnot's memoir remained for a long time unappreciated, and it was not until use was made of it by William Thomson... in 1848, to establish an absolute scale of temperature, that the merits of the method proposed in it were recognized. ...[H]e found that Carnot's proposition could no longer be proved by denying the possibility of "the ," and was led to lay down a second fundamental principle... now called the Second Law of Thermodynamics. ...It was published in March, 1851. In the previous year Clausias published a discussion of the same question... in which he lays down a principle for use in the demonstration of Carnot’s proposition, which, while not the same in form as Thomson’s, is the same in content, and ranks as another statement of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Clausius followed up this paper by others, and subsequently published a book in which the subject of Thermodynamics was given a systematic treatment, and in which he introduced and developed the important function called by him the ."

"As far as we know, entropy increases throughout the portion of the universe observable from Earth. It does not seem probable to us, but in any case nothing excludes, that beyond the particle horizon which marks the maximum limit of observations there exist regions in which the arrow of time is reversed compared to ours and in which entropy decreases. I dare not think of the theoretical and observational complications that would arise if the matter contained in one of these anomalous regions began to interact with ours."

"You should call it entropy, for two reasons. In the first place your uncertainty function has been used in statistical mechanics under that name, so it already has a name. In the second place, and more important, no one really knows what entropy really is, so in a debate you will always have the advantage."

"The most common way to describe entropy is as disorder... associated with things becoming more mixed, random and less ordered, but... the best way to think about entropy is as the tendency of energy to spread out. ...Most of the laws of physics work... the same... forwards or backwards in time. ...So how does this clear time dependence arise? ...[T]his is where Ludwig Boltzmann made an important insight. Heat flowing from cold to hot is not impossible, it's just improbable. ...In everyday solids there are about 100 trillion trillion atoms and even more energy packets, so heat flowing from cold to hot is just so unlikely that it never happens. ...[I]f the ...tendency is to spread out and for things to get messier, then how is it possible to have ...air conditioning, where the cold interior gets cooler and the hot exterior gets hotter? Energy is going from cold to hot, decreasing the entropy of the house. ...[T]his ...is only possible by increasing the entropy a greater amount ...at a power plant ...heating up the environment ...and creating waste heat in the fans and compressor [of the air conditioner]. ...How is there any structure left on earth? ...[I]f the earth were a the energy would spread out completely, meaning all life would cease, everything would decay and mix, and ...reach the same temperature. But luckily the earth is not a closed system, because we have the sun."

"In an isolated system, which cannot exchange energy and matter with the surroundings, this tendency is expressed in terms of a function of the macroscopic state of the system: the entropy."

"My greatest concern was what to call it. I thought of calling it 'information,' but the word was overly used, so I decided to call it 'uncertainty.' When I discussed it with John von Neumann, he had a better idea. Von Neumann told me, 'You should call it entropy, for two reasons. In the first place your uncertainty function has been used in statistical mechanics under that name, so it already has a name. In the second place, and more important, no one really knows what entropy really is, so in a debate you will always have the advantage.'"

"He sat in the window thinking. Man has a for order. Keys in one pocket, change in another. Mandolins are tuned G D A E. The physical world has a tropism for disorder, entropy. Man against Nature . . . the battle of the centuries. Keys yearn to mix with change. Mandolins strive to get out of tune. Every order has within it the germ of destruction. All order is doomed, yet the battle is worth while."

"Just like a computer, we must remember things in the order in which entropy increases. This makes the second law of thermodynamics almost trivial. Disorder increases with time because we measure time in the direction in which disorder increases. You can’t have a safer bet than that!"

"The homeostatic principle does not apply literally to the functioning of all complex living systems, in that in counteracting entropy they move toward growth and expansion."

"So if we're going to ask... What is life? ...Erwin Schrödinger wrote a famous book on that theme ...Two famous ideas ...emerged ...one ...was ...that genes are a code-script, and that was the first time anybody had used the word "code-script" or really thought in terms of information, in biology. ...This was before DNA was discovered. He was a direct inspiration to Watson and Crick and many others. The second theme... was how life maintains its organization over time, and why don't we just fall to pieces as entropy would tend to suggest... He talked about life feeding on negative entropy, or "negentropy"... [H]e talked about continually sucking order... from its environment. ...[I]t's a wonderful book. ...[H]e said, "If I had been catering for physicists alone I should have let the discussion turn on free energy instead." ...In more modern terms he's saying something like life is the harnessing of in such a way that the energy-harnessing device makes a copy of itself. ...[H]e's linking the two key themes of biology ...information and energy together."

"[F]or a physicist, the upper limit to entropy... is a critical, almost sacred quantity. ...the Bekenstein and Hawking result tells us that a theory that includes gravity is, in some sense, simpler than a theory that doesn't. ...If the maximum entropy in any given region of space is proportional to the region's surface area and not its volume, then perhaps the true, fundamental degrees of freedom—the attributes that have the potential to give rise to that disorder—actually reside on the region's surface and not within its volume. Maybe... the universe's physical processes take place on a thin, distant surface that surrounds us, and all we see and experience is merely a projection of those processes. Maybe... the universe is rather like a hologram."

"A natural guess is that... a black hole's entropy is... proportional to its volume. But in the 1970s and Stephen Hawking discovered that this isn't right. Their... analyses showed that the entropy... is proportional to the area of its ... less than what we'd naïvely guess. ...Berkenstein and Hawking found that... each square being one by one Planck length... the black hole's entropy equals the number of such squares that can fit on its surface... each Planck square is a minimal unit of space, and each carries a minimal, single unit of entropy. This suggests that there is nothing, even in principle, that can take place within a Planck square, because any such activity could support disorder and hence the Planck square could contain more than a single unit of entropy... Once again... we are led to the notion of an elemental spatial entity."

"Because entropy is not really a classical quantity, we must build quantum mechanics into the definition. ... It suffices to define entropy as the logarithm of the number of quantum states accessible to a system."

"The new information technologies can be seen to drive societies toward increasingly dynamic high-energy regions further and further from thermodynamical equilibrium, characterized by decreasing specific entropy and increasingly dense free-energy flows, accessed and processed by more and more complex social, economic, and political structures."

"If I took a heavy weight on the floor here and pushed it, it would slide and stop. ... So, a frictional effect seems to be irreversible. ... a frictional effect ... is the result of enormous complexity of the interaction of the block with the wood ... the jiggling of the atoms inside the wood of the block is changed into disorganized irregular wiggle-waggles of the atoms in the wood."

"In the year 1900 Max Planck wrote... E = hv, where E is the energy of a light wave, v is its , and h is... . It said that energy and frequency are the same thing measured in different units. Plank's constant gives you a rate of exchange for for converting frequency into energy... But in the year 1900 this made no physical sense. Even Plank himself did not understand it. ...Now Hawking has written down an equation which looks rather like Plank's equation... S = kA, where S is the entropy of a black hole, A is the area of its surface, and k is... Hawking's constant. Entropy means roughly the same thing as the of an object. ...Hawking's equation says that entropy is really the same thing as area. The exchange rate... is given by Hawking's constant... But what does it really mean to say that entropy and area are the same thing? We are as far away from understanding that now as Planck was of understanding quantum mechanics in 1900. ...[T]his equation will emerge as a central feature of the still unborn theory which will tie together gravitation and quantum mechanics and thermodynamics."

"Newton and his theories were a step ahead of the technologies that would define his age. Thermodynamics, the grand theoretical vision of the nineteenth century, operated in the other direction with practice leading theory. The sweeping concepts of energy, , work and entropy, which thermodynamics (and its later form, statistical mechanics) would embrace, began first on the shop floor. Originally the domain of engineers, thermodynamics emerged from their engagement with machines. Only later did this study of heat and its transformation rise to the heights of abstract physics and, finally, to a new cosmological vision."

"Rudolph Clausius... noticed a common feature of nature and had the stature... to publish [in 1850, Über die bewegende Kraft der Wärme (On the motive force of heat)] what others might think a simpleton's observation: heat does not flow from a cooler to a hotter body... [I]n this and subsequent papers he developed this... into a quantitative principle..."

"Revolution is everywhere, in everything. It is infinite. There is no final revolution, no final number. The social revolution is only one of an infinite number of numbers: the law of revolution is not a social law, but an immeasurably greater one. It is a cosmic, universal law—like the laws of the and of the dissipation of energy (entropy). Some day, an exact formula for the law of revolution will be established. And in this formula, nations, classes, stars—and books—will be expressed as numerical quantities."

"The quality of stored energy is measured by... entropy. ...[T]he lower the entropy the higher the quality."

"The concept of entropy was... rendered quantitatively precise by Rudolph Clausius in 1856... by defining the change... when energy is transferred to a system as heat. Specifically...Change\;in\;entropy = \frac{energy\;supplied\;as\;heat}{temperature\;at\;which\;the\;transfer\;occurs}[N]ote... temperature... is on the absolute scale..."

"If energy leaves a body as heat... 'energy supplied as heat' is negative, so the change in entropy is negative... the entropy of the body decreases..."

"Work itself does not generate or reduce entropy."

"There is nothing supernatural about the process of to states of higher entropy; it is a general property of systems, regardless of their materials and origin. It does not violate the Second Law of thermodynamics since the decrease in entropy within an open system is always offset by the increase of entropy in its surroundings."

"Black holes have the universe's most inscrutable poker faces. ...When you've seen one black hole with a given mass, charge, and spin (though you've learned these thing indirectly, through their effect on surrounding gas and stars...) you've definitely seen them all. ...black holes contain the highest possible entropy ...a measure of the number of rearrangements of an object's internal constituents that have no effect on its appearance. ...Black holes have a monopoly on maximal disorder. ...As matter takes the plunge across a black hole's ravenous , not only does the black hole's entropy increase, but its size increases as well. ...the amount of entropy ...tells us something about space itself: the maximum entropy that can be crammed into a region of space—any region of space, anywhere, anytime—is equal to the entropy contained within a black hole whose size equals the region in question."

"The equations of Newtonian mechanics are reversible in time and Poincaré proved that if a mechanical system is in a given state it will return infinitely often to a state arbitrarily close to the given one. Zermelo deduced that the Second Law of Thermodynamics is impossible in a mechanical system. Boltzmann asserted that entropy increases almost always, rather than always. However he believed that Poincaré's result, although correct in theory, was in practice impossible to observe since the time before a system returns to near its original state was too long."

"As the natural sciences have developed to encompass increasingly complex systems, scientific rationality has become ever more statistical, or probabilistic. The deterministic classical mechanics of the enlightenment was revolutionized by the near-equilibrium statistical mechanics of late 19th century atomists, by quantum mechanics in the early 20th century, and by the far-from-equilibrium complexity theorists of the later 20th century. Mathematical , information theory, and quantitative social sciences compounded the trend. Forces, objects, and natural types were progressively dissolved into statistical distributions: heterogeneous clouds, entropy deviations, s, gene frequencies, noise-signal ratios and redundancies, dissipative structures, and complex systems at the edge of chaos."

"Paul Davies, The Demon in the Machine (Sep. 7, 2019) 6th International FQXi Conference, "Mind Matters: Intelligence and Agency in the Physical World." A YouTube video source, 17:22."

"The remarks on negative entropy have met with doubt and opposition from physicist colleagues. ...[I]f I had been catering for them alone I should have let the discussion turn on free energy instead. It is the more familiar notion... [b]ut seemed linguistically too near energy for... the average reader... the concept is a rather intricate one, whose relation to Boltzmann's order-disorder principle is less easy to trace... '[E]ntropy with a negative sign'... is not my invention. It... [is] precisely the thing on which Boltzmann's original argument turned."