First Quote Added
April 10, 2026
Latest Quote Added
"3 Zarbon 15:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)"
"3 //Gbern3 (talk) 15:39, 4 July 2013 (UTC) -->"
"2 Zarbon 05:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC) -->"
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 18:18, 6 July 2012 (UTC) 3 Kalki 7 July 2005 00:13"
"4 Kalki (talk · contributions) 09:12, 2 July 2010 (UTC) * 3 Kalki 02:29, 3 July 2009 (UTC) with a lean toward 4. -->"
"1 Zarbon 05:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC) -->"
"3 Zarbon 05:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC) -->"
"3 InvisibleSun 08:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC)"
"4 InvisibleSun 08:14, 6 July 2007 (UTC) -->"
"3 AllanHainey 7 July 2005 13:38 (UTC)"
"4 Jeff Q (talk) 00:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)"
"3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 22:44, 7 June 2021 (UTC)"
"3 Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 00:37, 8 June 2022 (UTC)"
"3 Kalki (talk · contributions) 16:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)"
"4 Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 00:36, 8 June 2022 (UTC)"
"3 Kalki 23:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)"
"1 J.A.R.N.Y.|🗣️|📧 23:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)"
"1 I don't really get this. Is she criticizing literature, or just praising speech by comparison? J.A.R.N.Y.|🗣️|📧 23:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)"
"3 Kalki 04:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC) with a strong lean toward 4."
"2 J.A.R.N.Y.|🗣️|📧 23:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)"
"3 Kalki 04:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)"
"1 Rubbish computer (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 00:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)"
"1 This isn't really unique to architecture. You can say the same about any art form. J.A.R.N.Y.|🗣️|📧 23:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC)"
"1 Zarbon 13:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)"
"3 Kalki 04:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC) with a very strong lean toward 4."
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC) -->"
"3 This reminds me of the China brain thought experiment. -->"
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 21:21, 7 June 2019 (UTC) 2 Kalki 23:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)"
"3 InvisibleSun 23:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)"
"3 J.A.R.N.Y.|🗣️|📧 23:29, 6 June 2018 (UTC) -->"
"3 because this one is great. It takes a long time for man to understand. Zarbon 13:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC) -->"
"3 Kalki 22:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."
"3 InvisibleSun 21:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC) -->"
"2 Zarbon 13:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC) -->"
"3 Zarbon 13:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC) -->"
"3 InvisibleSun 19:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)"
"3 Kalki 22:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC) -->"
"2 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:57, 7 May 2022 (UTC), but there is no clear relationship to this date."
"proposed by Ilovemydoodle (talk) 02:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)"
"3 bystander (talk) 21:30, 6 May 2012 (UTC)"
"2 because sometimes the two are intertwined. Zarbon 05:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)"
"1 because this seems like a personal rant rather than a quote... Zarbon 05:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)"
"1 because that's not the only new thing. Sorry, don't agree with this. Zarbon 05:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)"
"2 Kalki 17:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)"
"1 because you can have a both separately as well. Zarbon 05:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)"
"3 because the more the state controls one's fate, the less one is able to control one's own fate. Zarbon 04:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)"
"4 Ficaia (talk) 09:48, 3 May 2024 (UTC) -->"
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 01:06, 8 May 2023 (UTC) 3 Kalki 17:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC) I too consider it a good quote. It indicates the truth that one's experiences and ideas can never be fully indicated in any writing or expressions, no matter how extensive or precise they may be in many ways, and that one's own interpretation and understanding of anything which is read or otherwise observed or thought upon must always be different to some degree, at different times, based upon one's always changing body of awareness and experience."
"1 because I'm sure many people do examine the same reading material more than once. If the context of the quote is meant to go beyond...to something deeper, it's rather too hidden insofar as understanding it goes. I'm wondering why you rated this one so high Invisible...I'm curious as to what makes the quote special to you...of course the author of any work would understand their work better than those who read it...it seems very logical and not very quoteworthy to me. If you still think the quote is rather good, I might be compelled to give it a 2 in the long run...but a 4? Why do you like it... Zarbon 05:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)"
"4 InvisibleSun 04:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)"