Days

"2 InvisibleSun 17:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)"

"3 ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 09:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)"

"Comment: featured prominently in w:The Illuminatus! Trilogy ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 09:24, 8 October 2005 (UTC)"

"2 InvisibleSun 22:11, 22 October 2008 (UTC)"

"1 Kalki 19:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)"

"1 Zarbon 05:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 00:30, 23 November 2018 (UTC) 3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 19:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC) -->"

"0 Zarbon 05:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)"

"4 Kalki 05:33, 18 October 2009 (UTC) * 3 Kalki 20:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)"

"2 //Gbern3 (talk) 19:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC) -->"

"3 //Gbern3 (talk) 19:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC) -->"

"3 InvisibleSun 22:11, 22 October 2008 (UTC) -->"

"4 InvisibleSun 19:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC) -->"

"4 Kalki 20:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC) 2 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 12:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC) with a lean toward 3."

"2 Waheedone 02:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)"

"3 Kalki 21:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)"

"3 DanielTom (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)"

"2 Kalki 23:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC)"

"2 Kalki 23:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC) but would extend this to:"

"3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 18:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."

"3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)"

"1 Kalki 21:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC) 2 Kalki 23:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC) I might eventually rank this higher, but this does not seem to be sourced to anything earlier than a 2007 book, which ironically, emphasizes at one point the distinction to be made between primary and secondary sources."

"1 //Gbern3 (talk) 19:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC) -->"

"3 Kalki 23:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC)— but there seems little or no obvious date connection."

"3 N6n 16:03, 9 September 2010 (UTC) -- Some information about the context in parenthesis will make it better. Say, "response to Bishop Wilberforce, who during a public debate had sarcastically questioned: "whether he was descended from an ape on his grandmother's side or his grandfather's"."

"3 Kalki 23:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC) with a strong lean toward 4 — but there seems little or no obvious date connection."

"2 Zarbon 15:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)"

"3 Kalki 23:34, 22 September 2008 (UTC) with a lean toward 4.— but there seems little or no obvious date connection."

"4 Zarbon 15:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)"

"3 InvisibleSun 17:36, 22 October 2006 (UTC)"

"1 InvisibleSun 22:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki·⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 22:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC) 2 Kalki 22:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC) -->"

"4 Kalki 23:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC) * 3 Kalki 18:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC) with a very strong lean toward 4."

"3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 00:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC) 1 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 19:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC) 2 Kalki 22:40, 22 November 2008 (UTC) // downgraded from 2, because there are now sufficient options that I have no further desire to see this one by a notoriously poor official used. -->"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC) 3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 18:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC) -->"

"2 Zarbon 15:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC) -->"

"2.5 //Gbern3 (talk) 13:44, 14 July 2013 (UTC)"

"3 Kalki 23:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC) with a lean toward 4, but not for this year. The greatest art of victory is in an magnanimity which is indeed often learned in defeat, though not necessarily through it. Many fail to learn of it sufficiently no matter how many ostensible defeats or victories they have, and others have learned it well, even if they personally suffer very few defeats. -->"

"4 --Coyote 23:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC) -->"

"4 InvisibleSun 22:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)"

"3 --Coyote 23:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)"

"3 InvisibleSun 22:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)"

"3 Kalki (talk · contributions) 09:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."

"3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC), with a strong lean toward 4."

"1 Zarbon 06:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC) -->"

"3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)"

"1 Kalki 16:52, 16 May 2009 (UTC) * 2 Kalki 19:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)"

"2 Zarbon 04:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)"

"2 I remember seeing this quotation, beginning "Hence no force," etc., cited in The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations as "an example of accidental rhyme and metre." In Bartlett's the quotation begins with "And so no force," etc. It might be better to restore the original phrasing, whichever it might be, so as to emphasize, by the cadence of the words, the serendipity of this rhymed-and-metered prose. - InvisibleSun 22:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)"