Jimmy Wales

"I don't really agree that most academics frown when they hear Wikipedia. Most academics I find quite passionate about the concept of Wikipedia and like it quite a bit. [...] The number of academics who really really don't like Wikipedia is really quite small and we find that they get reported on in the media far out of proportion to the amount they actually exist."

"We are a passionate community of volunteers who are trying to create a free encyclopedia for every single person on the planet. So we don't often think in terms of competition. We are going to do what we do and we hope Google does wonderful things as well. … If we were approaching this as a business we would think always: Oh, how can we position ourselves on the market... We just don't do any of that stuff."

"I have my team focused on the front end, working on the user experience, and making sure we have all the wiki-like tools people need to work on the site. We're just cranking away."

"To me the key thing is getting it right. And if a person's really smart and they're doing fantastic work, I don't care if they're a high school kid or a Harvard professor; it's the work that matters."

"I think this article was misleading in saying that I "recognized" Wikipe-tan. My removal of the sexualized version from Commons was in no way an endorsement of the standard versions. I don't like Wikipe-tan and never have. I recognize that some people do, and I'm not particularly agitated about it, but my name should not be invoked in a way that might lead some to believe that I approve. Thanks!--Jimbo Wales (talk) 11:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)"

"I'm on it pretty much all the time. I edit Wikipedia every day, I'm on Facebook, I'm on Twitter, I'm reading the news. During one of the US elections, I actually went through my computer and I blocked myself from looking at the major newspaper sites and Google News because I wasn't getting any work done."

"What we won't do is pretend that the work of lunatic charlatans is the equivalent of "true scientific discourse." It isn't."

"Real people are involved, and they can be hurt by your words. We are not tabloid journalism, we are an encyclopedia."

"I think that reality exists and that it's knowable"

"Greetings everyone!"

"I hope someone will create lots of articles about famous dresses. Our systemic bias caused by being a predominantly male geek community is worth some reflection in this contest. We have nearly 90 articles about Linux distributions… I think we can have an article about this dress. We should have articles about 100 famous dresses."

"Now, the UK is home to a very diverse newspaper community, a vibrant newspaper culture. We've got papers like The Sun, The Mirror, The Mail. [laughter]...we're trusted slightly more than the BBC. Now, that's a little scary -- [laughter]"

"One of the classic problems we have is -- and we have this a lot in English Wikipedia -- is the annoying user, who at least allegedly produces good content. There are users in the community who have a reputation for creating good content, and for being incredibly toxic personalities. This is a tough issue because [fixes slide problem] but my idea is very simple. Actually, on this issue, I have a very simple view is that most of these editors actually cost us more than they're actually worth, and we're making a big mistake by tolerating people who are causing us enormous..."

"A lot of them, they really cost more than they're worth, and they should be encouraged to leave, and not in a bad way. I mean one of the things that I've always believed is letting people walk away with dignity. We don't have to shame them and scream at them and make them leave and then they're sad and annoyed and then they make sock puppets and then they come back and harass us for years."

"Wikipedia is something special. It is like a library or a public park. It is like a temple for the mind. It is a place we can all go to think, to learn, to share our knowledge with others. When I founded Wikipedia, I could have made it into a for-profit company with advertising banners, but I decided to do something different. We’ve worked hard over the years to keep it lean and tight. We fulfill our mission efficiently."

"In case anyone is wondering I strongly support the development and widespread adoption of a covid-19 vaccine and will take it as soon as it is widely available... I don't think I should be in the first wave to take it as that should be people more vulnerable or more likely to be spreaders..."

"I think that's right. [replying to comment: "it should go to health care workers first"]. I'm not an expert. I just know that I'm healthy and safe at home, so it will be more helpful for others to go first. But I'm eager to take it!"

"President's power does not extend to threatening or shutting down social media platforms. But we should fear this in every country. Worst case scenario is that platforms don't have courage to tell Trump to go away, that they begin to adapt policies to his whims because he is a lunatic,"

"You cannot write a good Wikipedia article about a small town if there is no longer news about this small town. This [trend] will impact the quality of Wikipedia long-term."

"The next billion people who'll get online access will enter the Internet with mobile devices. It's difficult to write Wikipedia articles on smart phones. So we're investing more and more resources to improve access for these people."

"Education and innovation are two things that we can fall back on in the most uncertain times! Join me July 1, 4 PM IST on @unacademy, I will speak about education and my early life that propelled me to create Wikipedia.... unacademy.onelink..."

"I predict that https://gov.uk/home-education is going to be dramatically more popular this coming year."

"When is the last time you saw a politician talking about Aristotle's Virtues? This is what I love seeing -@RoryStewartUKpost on WT: https://wt.social/post/vg6w2a75311699787861"

"Take a look at this: http://vaccinecommongood.org"

"On Sunday July 5th at 5pm we’re all saying #ThankYouTogether! Whether you’re thanking the NHS, key workers, delivery drivers or a friend, neighbour or colleague who has helped you during this time - join us on your doorstep and help spread the word. together.org.uk"

"I support freedom of expression. A lot of people I disagree with also support freedom of expression. If that's controversial, then someone will have to explain to me why."

""Wikipedia ist zwar als Institution in vielerlei Hinsicht egalitaristisch und basisdemokratisch"

""Wichtig sind soziale Regeln und Normen und ein respektvoller Umgang miteinander. Aber nur bis zu einem bestimmten Punkt: Wenn jemand mehr Ärger verursacht als er wert ist, sollte er aus der Gemeinschaft verbannt werden. Die Herausbildung einer solchen Gemeinschaft ist ein kontinuierlicher Prozeß"

""Tue mehr von dem, was funktioniert – und weniger von dem anderen.“"

"Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der das gesamte Wissen der Menschheit jedem frei zugänglich ist. Das ist unser Ziel!"

"Stell dir eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch auf der Erde freien Zugang zum gesamten menschlichem Wissen hat. Das ist, was wir machen."

"Lehrbücher unter freier Lizenz sind die nächste große Sache im Bildungsbereich."

"Intelligente Leute arbeiten nicht freiwillig in einer Atmosphäre von Missachtung und Beschimpfungen."

"Ich bin eine Art konstitutioneller Monarch: Die Königin von England. Wenn sich die Community nicht einigen kann, bittet man mich, zu entscheiden."

""Es hat natürlich Schlagzeilen gegeben, ich fand das ganz amüsant. Das Interessante daran ist die Debatte, die wir seit langem innerhalb der Wikipedia führen: Was soll man löschen, was soll drin bleiben? Wo zieht man die Grenze? Ich bin ein stärkerer Verfechter des Löschens als viele andere"

"Die wirklich guten Artikel in unserer Enzyklopädie wurden von einem oder zwei Autoren geschrieben."

"Die Relevanzkriterien sind für die Wikipedia sehr wichtig. [...] Bei manchen Dingen ist es einfach unmöglich, die Wahrheit mit Hilfe verlässlicher Quellen zu belegen. Einen solchen Artikel zu behalten ist eine Einladung für einen Hoax."

"Die Menschen sollen sich an die jetzigen Gründerjahre so erinnern, wie man heute an die Gründung der Bibliothek von Alexandria denkt."

"Null Information ist besser als irreführende oder falsche Information."