Mathematics

1837 quotes
0 likes
0Verified
101Authors

Timeline

First Quote Added

April 10, 2026

Latest Quote Added

April 10, 2026

All Quotes

"If we write the equation of the hyperboloid in the form \frac{x^2}{ a^2} - \frac{z^2}{c^2} = 1 - \frac{y^2}{b^2}, \qquad (1)It is evident that (1) is the product of two equations\begin{array}{lcl} \frac{x}{a} - \frac{z}{c} = k_1(1 - \frac{y}{b}), \\ \frac{x}{a} + \frac{z}{c} = \frac{1}{k_1}(1 + \frac{y}{b}), \qquad (2) \end{array}for any value of k_1. But (2) are the equations of a straight line... Moreover this straight line lies entirely on the surface, since the coordinates of every point of it satisfy (2) and hence (1). As different values are assigned to k_1, we obtain a series of straight lines lying entirely on the surface. Conversely if P_1( x_1, y_1, z_1) is any point of (1), \frac{\frac{x_1}{a} - \frac{z_1}{c}}{1 - \frac{y_1}{b}} = \frac{1 + \frac{y_1}{b}}{\frac{x_1}{a} + \frac{z_1}{c}}Therefore P_1 determines the same value of k_1 from both equations (2). Hence every point of (1) lies in one and only one line (2). We may also regard (1) as the product of the two equations\begin{array}{lcl} \frac{x}{a} - \frac{z}{c} = k_2(1 + \frac{y}{b}), \\ \frac{x}{a} + \frac{z}{c} = \frac{1}{k_2}(1 - \frac{y}{b}), \qquad (3) \end{array}whence it is evident that there is a second set of straight lines lying entirely on the surface, one and only one of which may be drawn through any point of the surface. Equations (2) and (3) are the equations of the rectilinear generators, and every point of the surface may be regarded as the point of intersection of one line from each set."

- Hyperboloid

• 0 likes• mathematics•
"Among the first of those who bade adieu to the Scholastic creed was the Cardinal Nicolas Cusanus, a man of rare sagacity and an able mathematician; who arranged and republished the Pythagorean Ideas, to which he was much inclined, in a very original manner, by the aid of his Mathematical knowledge. He considered God as the unconditional Maximum, which at the same time, as Absolute Unity, is also the unconditional Minimum, and begets of Himself and out of Himself, Equality and the combination of Equality with Unity (Son and Holy Ghost). According to him, it is impossible to know directly and immediately this Absolute Unity (the Divinity); because we can make approaches to the knowledge of Him only by the means of Number or Plurality. Consequently he allows us only the possession of very imperfect notions of God, and those by mathematical symbols. It must be admitted that the Cardinal did not pursue this thought very consequently, and that his view of the universe which he connected with it, and which represented it as the Maximum condensed, and thus become finite, was very obscure. Nor was he more successful in his view of the one-ness of the Creator and of Creation, or in his attempt to explain the mysteries of the Trinity and Incarnation, by means of this Pantheistic Theism. Nevertheless, numerous profound though undeveloped observations on the faculty of cognition, are found in his writings, interspersed with his prevailing Mysticism. For instance, he observes, that the principles of knowledge possible to us are contained in our ideas of Number (ratio explicata) and their several relations; that absolute knowledge is unattainable to us (precisio veritatis inattingibilis, which he styled docta ignorantia), and that all which is attainable to us is a probable knowledge (conjectura). With such opinions he expressed a sovereign contempt for the Dogmatism of the Schools."

- Mathematics and mysticism

• 0 likes• mathematics• religion-and-science•
"It seems necessary to say something at the outset in justification of the scientific as against the mystical attitude. Metaphysics, from the first, has been developed by the union or the conflict of these two attitudes. Among the earliest Greek philosophers, the Ionians were more scientific and the Sicilians more mystical. But among the latter, Pythagoras, for example, was in himself a curious mixture of the two tendencies: the scientific attitude led him to his proposition on right-angled triangles, while his mystic insight showed him that it is wicked to eat beans. Naturally enough, his followers divided into two sects, the lovers of right-angled triangles and the abhorrers of beans; but the former sect died out, leaving, however, a haunting flavour of mysticism over much Greek mathematical speculation, and in particular over Plato's views on mathematics. Plato, of course, embodies both the scientific and the mystical attitudes in a higher form than his predecessors, but the mystical attitude is distinctly the stronger of the two, and secures ultimate victory whenever the conflict is sharp. Plato, moreover, adopted from the the device of using logic to defeat common sense, and thus to leave the field clear for mysticism—a device still employed in our own day by the adherents of the classical tradition. The logic used in defence of mysticism seems to me faulty as logic..."

- Mathematics and mysticism

• 0 likes• mathematics• religion-and-science•
"Mathematics has ceased to seem to me non-human in its subject matter. I have come to believe, though very reluctantly, that it consists of tautologies. I fear that, to a mind of sufficient intellectual power, the whole of mathematics would appear trivial, as trivial as the statement that a four-footed animal is an animal. I think that the timelessness of mathematics has none of the sublimity that it once seemed to me to have, but consists merely in the fact that the pure mathematician is not talking about time. I can no longer find any mystical satisfaction in the contemplation of mathematical truth. ... One effect of the War was to make it impossible to go on living in a world of abstraction. ... I have no longer the feeling that intellect is superior to sense, and that only Plato's world of ideas gives access to the 'real' world. I used to think of sense, and of thought which is built on sense, as a prison... I now think of sense, and of thoughts built on sense, as windows... I think that we can, however imperfectly, mirror the world, like Leibniz's monads; and I think it is the duty of the philosopher to make himself as undistorting a mirror as he can. ...to recognize such distortions ...Of these, the most fundamental is that we view the world from the here and now, not with that large impersonality which theists attribute to the Deity. To achieve such impartiality is impossible for us, but we can travel a certain distance towards it. To show the road to this end is the supreme duty of the philosopher."

- Mathematics and mysticism

• 0 likes• mathematics• religion-and-science•