"In crossing a heath, suppose I pitched my foot against a stone and were asked how the stone came to be there, I might possibly answer that for anything I knew to the contrary it had lain there forever; nor would it, perhaps, be very easy to show the absurdity of this answer. But suppose I found a watch upon the ground, and it should be inquired how the watch happened to be in that place, I should hardly think of the answer which I had given, that for anything I knew the watch might have always been there. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone; why is it not admissible in that second case as in the first? For this reason, and for no other, namely, that when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive — what we could not discover in the stone — that its several parts are framed and put together for a purpose, e.g., that they are so formed and adjusted as to produce motion, and that motion so regulated as to point out the hour of the day; that if the different parts had been differently shaped from what they are, or placed in any other manner or in any other order than that in which they are placed, either no motion at all would have carried on in the machine, or none which would have answered the use that is now served by it. This mechanism being observed … the inference we think is inevitable, that the watch must have had a maker — that there must have existed, at some time and at some place or other, an artificer or artificers who formed it for the purpose which we find it actually to answer, who comprehended its construction and designed its use. Nor would it, I apprehend, weaken the conclusion, that we had never seen a watch made; that we had never known an artist capable of making one; that we were altogether incapable of executing such a piece of workmanship ourselves, or of understanding in what manner it was performed; all this being no more than what is true of some exquisite remains of ancient art, of some lost arts, and, to the generality of mankind, of the more curious productions of modern manufacture."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Philosophers from EnglandUniversity of Cambridge facultyChristian apologistsAnglicans from the United KingdomClergy from England
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Ch. 1 : State of the Argument.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/William_Paley
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
William Paley
William Paley (July 1743 – 25 May 1805) was a British Christian apologist, philosopher, and utilitarian.
24 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by William Paley →
Related Quotes
"[T]he subject ... of animals devouring one another, forms the chief, if not the only instance, in the works of the De…"
"These properties of animals, wherever they are found, must, I think, be referred to design; because there is, in all …"
"Now, according to the established order of Nature, (which we must suppose to prevail, or we cannot reason at all upon…"
"[T]he system of destruction amongst animals holds an express relation to the system of fecundity; that they are parts…"
"But then this superfecundity, though of great occasional use and importance, exceeds the ordinary capacity of nature …"
"These are the natures appropriated to the situation. Let [the wild beasts] enjoy their existence; let them have their…"
"[E]lections to the supreme power having upon some occasions produced the most destructive contentions, many states wo…"
"Government, at first, was either patriarchal or military; that of a parent over his family, or of a commander over hi…"
"Some excuse seems necessary for the pain and loss which we occasion to brutes, by restraining them of their liberty, …"
"This is atheism: for every indication of contrivance, every manifestation of design which existed in the watch, exist…"