"In its European countries of origin, secularism (French: laicité) wanted to be a way to contain the Christian Churches, to make and keep the State free from interference by the Church. In the budding United States, the emphasis was slightly different: to keep the Churches free from interference by the State. At any rate, the core idea was separation of Church and State. The most fundamental characteristic of a secular state is the equality of all its citizens before the law, regardless of religion. In that sense, India is not a secular state at all. Its Constitution mandates quite a bit of State interference in religious laws and institutions, at least those of the Hindus, and formally as well as effectively discriminates against its religious majority. It does not satisfy the very first criterion of a secular state, viz. the legal equality of all citizens regardless of religion. On the contrary, in family matters, there are different sets of laws for Hindus, Muslims, Christians and Parsis. The most famous example is of course that a Muslim man can have four wives, others cannot. The discrimination lies not only in the the State’s perpetuation of a consequential inequality, but also in the genesis of that inequality through State intervention, viz. by the abolition of polygamy where it existed in Hindu society versus its deliberate non-abolition among Muslims. One can recognize an incompetent India-watcher by his pompous claim that “India is secular state”. It is not, period. [...] Thus, in the West, secularism means that all citizens are equal before the law, regardless of their religion; or what Indians call a Common Civil Code. In India, by contrast, all secularists swear by the preservation of the present system of separate religion-based Personal Laws, though they prefer to avoid the subject, hopefully from embarassment at the contradiction. And all Indian secularists swear by the preservation of constitutional, legal and factual discriminations against the Hindu majority. (In case you have recently lived on another planet and don’t believe that there are such discriminations, one example: the Right to Education Act 2006, which imposes some costly duties on schools except minority schools, has led to the closure of hundreds of Hindu schools.)"
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Elst, Koenraad. Hindu Dharma and the Culture Wars. (2019). New Delhi : Rupa.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Uniform_civil_code
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Uniform civil code
32 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Uniform civil code →
Related Quotes
"The state shall endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India."
"One wonders how long it will take for the Government of the day to implement the mandate of the framers of the Consti…"
"The failure to adopt a Uniform civil code [has the effect that] Muslim women suffer because they do not have an equal…"
"We have to insist on a common personal law for all citizens of India."
"A Common Civil Code has been a long-standing demand of the Jana Sangh-BJP, and therefore it is deemed a “communal” de…"
"The classic example given is the Shah Bano case of 1985: repudiated by her husband, the Muslim woman Shah Bano went t…"
"This totally non-secular arrangement was meant to be only temporary, for the Constitution stipulates in its directive…"
"An Anti-Common Civil Code Convention was held by Muslims at the Talkatora Indoor Stadium in New Delhi on July 4, 1995…"
"Many a time aggrieved parties (like divorced Muslim women) have approached the courts for redressal and many a time t…"
"There is nothing non-secular or sectarian in demanding that the provisions of Indian civil laws should apply evenhand…"