"Although we often hear the rather glib assertion that medieval Indian Sufis were primarily responsible for converting Hindus to Islam, the issue has not been at all closely examined. (...) In sum, the Warrior Sufi may be seen as one of the earliest products that arose from the contact between Arab Islamic and Indie civilizations. In their psychological appeal, philosophical underpinnings, and historical development, these two civilizations are diametrically opposed. Where the one is ardent, dogmatic, and austere, the other is reflective, syncretic, and sentimental. Where Arab Islam centers upon the submission to a single discipline and perceives society, the universe, and the divine principle in terms of unity, Indie Hinduism diffuses into an elusive aggregate of metaphysical systems, folk beliefs, customs, symbols, and traditions that collectively perceive society, the universe, and the divine principle in terms of plurality. By the early fourteenth century the Arab Islamic and Indie traditions had only just begun their long and tortuous process of fusing into what later was to become “Indian Islam.” Hence the Warrior Sufi did not represent a synthesis of the Islamic and Indie traditions, but only a transplant of the former into the world of the latter. (...) More than that, the phenomenon of Sufis using their prestige to lead, or as was more likely the case, to legitimize a jihad spelled the ultimate breakdown of relations between landed Sufis and non-Muslims. There is no record of any landed or orthodox Sufi in the kingdom at this time urging the policy of “peace with all” ( suhl-i kitll), a slogan that many writers have attributed to Indian Sufis generally. (...) Some of [the Sufis of Bijapur] wielded a sword, others a pen, others a royal land grant, and still others a begging bowl... Some were orthodox to the point of zealous puritanism, others unorthodox to the point of heresy. Indeed, this study demonstrates that the stereotyped conception of medieval Indian Sufis as pious and quietistic mystics patiently preaching Islam among Hindus is no longer valid. It is simply not possible to generalize about the Sufis of medieval Bijapur, much less of India as a whole, as any unitary group relating in any single or predictable way to the society in which they lived. They clearly played a variety of social roles."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Richard Eaton, Sufis of Bijapur
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Sufism_in_India
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Sufism in India
24 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Sufism in India →
Related Quotes
"On the other hand, there is considerable evidence of colonial-era Muslim communities attributing to Sufi shaikhs – or…"
"But in the second half of the twelfth century A.D., we find a new type of Muslim saint appearing on the scene and dom…"
"There is plenty of primary literature available in Arabic and Persian regarding the rise, development, and doings of …"
"It cannot be maintained that Islam did not provide an ample opportunity to Hindu saints, philosophers and princes to …"
"[Most of the mystic records and Diwans are forgeries] “but regard for public opinion has prevented them (Indian schol…"
"The Musalmans have no missionary labours to record… We find no trace of any missionary movement for converting non-Mu…"
"Sufi s played a key role in the Islamization of what is now Pakistan, northern and central India, and Bangladesh, whe…"
"It is said that saint-worship among Muslims is a practice unique to India. Dargahs of Sufis, real or figurative, are …"
"The sufis belonged to a number of orders. Four of those orders Chishti, Suhrawardi, Qadiri and Naqshabandi - became p…"
"Ironically, one of the few things that Indian and Pakistani textbooks seem to agree on is in fact a falsehood: namely…"