"Creationism does not merit scientific discussion. As we found in the last chapter, Creation “science” is not a promising rival to evolutionary theory. It is not integrated with the rest of science, but is a hodgepodge of doctrines, lacking independent support. It offers no startling predictions, no advances in knowledge. We cannot commend it for any ability to shed light on questions that orthodox theories are unable to answer. Nor can we praise it for offering a definite alternative that might help scientists in their quest for an improved biological or geological theory. “Scientific” Creationism has no evidence that speaks in its favor, partly because Creationists are so meticulous in leaving their doctrines blurred."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Philosophers from EnglandBiographers from the United KingdomAcademics from the United KingdomNon-fiction authors from EnglandSkeptics
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Chapter 6, “Exploiting Tolerance” (p. 171)
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Philip_Kitcher
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Philip Kitcher
31 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Philip Kitcher →
Related Quotes
"Creationist strategy is often to run entirely different issues together, to concoct a muddy paste out of distinct all…"
"The book that follows is a chase. The Creationist is allowed to choose one battleground after another. Given each cho…"
"Creationists are actually criticizing methods that are used throughout science. As I shall argue extensively, there i…"
"Ironically, philosophers of science owe the Creationists a debt. For the “scientific” Creationists have constructed a…"
"In almost any natural population of organisms, more offspring will be produced than are able to survive. The offsprin…"
"Evolutionary change is change in the genetic constitution of a population. This type of change can come about as a re…"
"Do the doctrine’s problem-solving strategies encounter recurrent difficulties in a significant range of cases? Are th…"
"Consistency is not the hobgoblin of the Creationist mind."
"The road to Creationism is paved with bad philosophy."
"Even if Creationists continue to lose in the courts, they may still succeed in wreaking havoc upon science education …"