"Paul Samuelson is omnipresent in American and even world economics; like Joyce's Humphrey Chimpeden Earwicker or Melville's Confidence Man,. he appears at every turn of history and in every disguise."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Academics from the United StatesJews from the United StatesEconomists from the United StatesNobel laureates in EconomicsPeople from Gary
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Kenneth J. Arrow, "Samuelson Collected", Journal of Political Economy Vol. 75, No. 5 (Oct., 1967), pp. 730-737
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Paul_Samuelson
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Paul Samuelson
Paul Anthony Samuelson (May 15, 1915 ā December 13, 2009) was an American economist. He was the first American to win the Nobel Prize in Economics.
119 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Paul Samuelson ā
Related Quotes
"The General Theory caught most economists under the age of 35 with the unexpected virulence of a disease first attackā¦"
"Herein lies the secret of the General Theory. It is a badly written book, poorly organized; any layman who, beguiled ā¦"
"Just as Hegel is said to have understood his philosophy for the first time when he read its French translation, Vilfrā¦"
"I was lucky to enter economics in 1932. Analytical economics was poised for its take-off. I faced a lovely vacuum thaā¦"
"The existence of analogies between central features of various theories implies the existence of a general theory whiā¦"
"The general method involved may be very simply stated. In cases where the equilibrium values of our variables can be ā¦"
"In the preface to the reissue of Risk, Uncertainty and Proļ¬t, Frank Knight makes the penetrating observation that undā¦"
"Figure 12-6 pulls together in a simplified way the main elements of income determination. Without saving and investmeā¦"
"I think the acceptance of "mathematical expectation of utility" or its "arithmetic mean" was an unthinking carryover ā¦"
"Science is not art. Yet, despite the lack of complete identity between art and science, there is much in common amongā¦"