"Analogies from history must, of course, be treated with care. Using the wrong one not only can present an oversimplified picture of a complex situation in the present but can lead to wrong decisions. After September 11, 2001, it became fashionable, especially among neo- Conservatives, to talk about how the West finds itself engaged in World War IV. Norman Podhoretz, a leading neo-con thinker, argued that the Cold War was really World War III and that now, after a too-brief period of peace in the 1990s, we are engaged in an equally massive and deadly struggle against Islamic fundamentalism. Like the other world wars, the United States and its allies are the innocent party; others have thrust war upon them. The West is only defending itself, even in wars like the Iraq one where it launched the attack. In such a view, the war is a moral one, of good against bad. A convenient shorthand, the authorship of which is proudly claimed by the Canadian David Frum, is the “Axis of Evil.” No matter that the Axis in World War II was a working set of alliances between Germany, Italy, and Japan and that this one is said to include Iraq and Iran, countries that waged a long war against each other in the 1980s, and North Korea, whose leaders probably have trouble finding their two reputed partners on the map. No matter, too, that the Cold War was not like the great military struggles of the two world wars and did not end with an armistice on the battlefields but with the collapse of one of the protagonists. Those who criticize the open-ended and ill-defined nature of the “war on terror” or the occupation of Iraq are dismissed as isolationists, cowards, or worse. Reviewing Podhoretz’s recent work, World War IV: The Long Struggle against Islamofascism, Ian Buruma wrote: “The book expresses a weird longing for the state of war, for the clarity it brings, and for the chance to divide one’s fellow citizens, or indeed the whole world, neatly into friends and foes, comrades and traitors, warriors and appeasers, those who are with us and those who are against.”"
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Margaret MacMillan, The Uses and Abuses of History (2008), pp. 175-177
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Neoconservatism
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Neoconservatism
27 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Neoconservatism →
Related Quotes
"At the same time, Kissinger, Carter and détente were condemned as weakening the West by a group of conservative Democ…"
"[N]eoconservatism at its root is basically just saying what’s good is good for everybody. Not everybody all the time,…"
"What the heck is a neocon anyway in 2003? A friend of mine suggests it means the kind of right-winger a liberal would…"
"There's no "neo" in my conservatism."
"Inside the administration are Vice President Dick Cheney and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz. Their agenda is…"
"A Democrat who has infiltrated the Republican Party."
"If anything, Washington’s neoconservatives have an unerring instinct for survival. Having brought about multiple disa…"
"The Americans occupying Iraq couldn’t even admit to themselves they were colonialists. Instead, the State Department …"
"You know, I have repeatedly defended President Bush against the left on Iraq, even though I think he should have wait…"
"Our "neoconservatives" are neither new nor conservative, but old as Babylon and evil as Hell."