"So the way I want to think about this, the job of this program. So I'm going to make a robot. I'm going to put a program in the head of the robot. So let's say, I'm not going to worry about hardware. I'm just going to read about the software. And so the program that I'm going to put in the head of my robot, it has to do this job that's written in the formula up here. And what this is just shorthand for saying is that it has to represent some kind of mapping from observation and actions that it's had in the past. So o, a star means the whole history of observations and actions that it's ever had. Based on that, it has to pick the next action. So that's not really saying much of anything at all. That's just a description of every single robot control program basically that's been written. You have to take your history of actions and observations, compute the next action."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Computer scientists from the United StatesWomen academics from the United StatesStanford University alumniWomen scientists from the United StatesMassachusetts Institute of Technology faculty
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Imported from EN Wikiquote
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Leslie_P._Kaelbling
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Leslie P. Kaelbling
Leslie Pack Kaelbling is an American roboticist and the Panasonic Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She is widely recognized for adapting partially observable Markov decision processes from operations research for application in artificial intelligence and robotics. Kaelbling received the IJCAI Computers and Thought Award in 1997 for applying reinforcement learning to embedded control systems and developing programming tools for robot nav
33 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Leslie P. Kaelbling →
Related Quotes
"Fundamentally, the way we think about it is that we decompose the computation that's in the robot's head now into two…"
"So the dimensionality of the space is kind of unthinkably high. It's also not exactly clear what constitutes an objec…"
"And so any approach that works effectively in a domain like this is going to have to handle very large spaces, very l…"
"The reason I want to start by backing all the way up to this like very basic control theory picture is that right now…"
"So I imagine that there's some distribution over possible environments that the robot could find itself in when it ac…"
"So imagine that you have some kind of probability distribution over the worlds that the robot could actually end up o…"
"So one way to think about the whole problem set up then is that I, as the robotics engineer, have to do for my robots…"
"So there are a bunch of ways you can think about the problem. I mean, one would be to say, "Oh, I'm really lazy. I do…"
"Another strategy-- and this is like the classic engineering strategy-- is that, no, I'm like a serious engineer. And …"
"But the problem is now I've written down an objective function. I've said, "Oh, if you could tell me a distribution o…"