"He... explain[ed] how the astronomers... had to grapple with the problem of defining definition, because for 2 1/2 millennia there had been just one standard of time... the rotation of the earth. ...[T]hat had provided an incredibly accurate clock. It's... lost only a few hours in 2 1/2 thousand years. ...Very easy to use. Astronomers only... had to glance at the night sky, at the... Big Dipper... to tell the time within a minute or two... But in the 1890s a crisis developed when they found that using the earth... and... Newton's laws of motion and gravity... the Moon was speeding up. ...[T]hey thought ...the earth was slowing down because of the tidal effects of the moon... and... this would mean that the earth was not a good timekeeper at the accuracy that they wanted."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Imported from EN Wikiquote
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Julian_Barbour
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Julian Barbour
40 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Julian Barbour →
Related Quotes
"In fact, I once had a discussion with a distinguished astrophysicist who said to me, well, this is what Mach said, an…"
"(quote at 14:08 of 1:54:14)"
"[[Time|[T]ime]] is really an illusion... and motion too... [T]hey are not really there in the external world. They ar…"
"If you could freeze the camera now and... show me as I am, and all the atoms... and... the whole universe... like a s…"
"If you could look microscopically... at... my molecules... you would not recognize me from one second to another. In …"
"[T]he work that I did with... has shown... time that is measured by clocks is... an average of all the changes in the…"
"[I]f you imagine two NOWs... there will be some difference between them, and if you work out some weighted average of…"
"[T]his is very different from the Newtonian picture where Newton presupposes there's a river of time flowing, that is…"
"[A NOW] has no duration. ...[I]t's absolutely instantaneous. There is no thickness to it. Nothing changes. ...So thes…"
"Thus, even now, three and a half centuries after Galileo... it is still remarkably difficult to say categorically whe…"