"There is a nice story which is rather revealing about the power of Keynes's arguments and their political content. It is about John Strachey, a Marxist. He was a cousin of Lytton Strachey β they both had the same skill in writing. John Strachey wrote a book called The Coming Struggle for Power. In the 1930s this book was so influential in Cambridge, England, that, when I got there, every person had it on his bookshelf, prominently displayed. It was an exciting book, intellectually exciting to read. It was the Bible of Cambridge students. In my last year at Cambridge Strachey was invited by the Marshall Society, which was the general undergraduate society for economics student, to give a talk. In this talk he argued that Marx showed us the way to make the system work, an argument that met a very, very strong favorable response β as his earlier writing had done. I had been asked in advance to move a vote of thanks at the end of the lecture; say a few words, if I could, about his lecture, but essentially to move a vote of thanks. I did, except I took the occasion to say that there would appear β this was in November 1935 β within a few months a book that would set out a superior method of analysis. It had been written by John Maynard Keynes. I didn't know whether Strachey would know the name. He motioned to me and said, "I'd like to thank you for your vote of thanks," and so on; "I'd like to find out more about the book by Keynes." And I told him, and he took down the name. At the time, I did not realize the connection between Keynes and Lytton Strachey and Lytton and John Strachey. A couple of years later I received a new book by John Strachey in the mail from the Left Book Club. I was astounded; it was absolutely Keynes. I mean, he was so much influenced by Keynes β he had been so strongly influenced by Keynes that he became an instant, overnight, follower. Strachey really understood Keynes; it's a brilliant exposition and application to the British situation. It's rather more interesting than Keynes and deserves to be reprinted. It shows how Keynes had refuted Communism and how John Strachey, an extreme Marxist whose life up to then had been devoted to Marx and the Marxian course, had been completely changed by Keynes. Given that history, the later attacks on U.S. Keynesians, accusing them of being Communists, were incomprehensible to me."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Anti-fascistsMembers of the Parliament of the United KingdomLabour Party (UK) politiciansJournalists from England
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
John Strachey
Evelyn John St Loe Strachey (21 October 1901 β 15 July 1963) was a British Labour politician and writer.
6 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by John Strachey β
Related Quotes
"The fascist method essentially implies the attempt to create a popular mass movement for the protection of monopoly cβ¦"
"It is almost always impossible to get the fascist party together without using some anti-capitalist slogans, in the eβ¦"
"The retention of power by the capitalist class by means of the success of a fascist party necessarily implies the scrβ¦"
"The institutions of democracy will be gradually and, if possible, imperceptibly withdrawn. The Press will become a beβ¦"
"Strachey [was] the most persuasive Marxist who has ever influenced this country's thinking."
"Huddar would have been 101 now had he been alive. But then centenaries are not celebrated only to register how old soβ¦"
"I regret I was not there to listen to Balaji Huddar's speech [...] No matter how many times you listen to him, his spβ¦"
"Young though he was, his radiant energy produced such an impression of absolute reliability that Hedgewar made him thβ¦"
"Largely because of the influence of communists in London, Huddar's conversion into an enthusiastic supporter of the fβ¦"
"By the time he came out of Franco's prison, Huddar had relinquished many of his old ideas. He displayed a worldview cβ¦"