"The Christian claim to the site of the Holy Cross is based on the dream of a gullible but fanatical woman, and fortified with a faked excavation. 4 Remember the Ayodhya debate, where Hindu scholars were challenged to produce ever more solid proof of the traditions underlying the sacredness of the controversial site? Whatever proof they came up with was automatically, without any inspection, dismissed by the high priests of secularism as “myth” and “faked evidence”. It was alleged that there was a “lack of proof” for the assumption that Rama ever lived there. But in the case of the Christian sacred places, we do not just have lack of proof that the religion’s claim is true, but we have positive proof that its claim is untrue, and that it was historically part of a campaign of fraud and destruction.... This massive campaign of fraud and destruction was subsequently extended to the Germanic, Slavic and Baltic countries. Numerous ancient churches across Europe are so many Babri Masjids, containing or standing on the left-overs of so many Rama Janmabhoomi temples. Just after the christianisation of Europe was completed with the forced conversion of Lithuania in the fifteenth century, the iconoclastic zeal was taken to America, and finally to Africa and Asia....the tribal areas became the scene of culture murder by Catholic and Protestant missionaries. There are recent instances of desecration of tribal village shrines and sacred groves by Christians, assaults on Hindu processions both in the tribal belts and in the south, and attempts to turn the Vivekananda Rock Memorial at Kanyakumari into a Virgin Mary shrine. ...In South India, the myth of St. Thomas provided the background for a few instances of temple destruction at places falsely associated with his life and alleged martyrdom, especially the St. Thomas Church replacing the Mylapore Shiva Temple in Madras. In this case, the campaign of fraud is still continuing: till today, Christian writers continue to claim historical validity for the long-refuted story of the apostle Thomas coming to India and getting killed by jealous Brahmins. 8 The story is parallel to that of Jesus getting killed by the Jews, and it has indeed served as an argument in an elaborate Christian doctrine of anti- Brahminism which resembles Christian anti-Semitism to the detail. At any rate, it is a fraud...."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Why Indians Should Reject St. Thomas And Christianity– Koenraad Elst
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ishwar_Sharan
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Ishwar Sharan
104 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Ishwar Sharan →
Related Quotes
"Both Rufinus and Socrates would have known the Greek version of the Acts which was made immediately after the Syriac …"
"This writer once had the misfortune of meeting The Hindu editor, N. Ram. He arrived one morning in 1992 on our ashram…"
"While the belief that Thomas settled in South India came about as an honest mistake, the claim that he was martyred b…"
"The famous English historian Arnold Toynbee observed that the mission and death of St. Thomas in India was legendary …"
"The revelation that the tomb of St. Peter is a fake will not come as a surprise to Europeans. They know better than a…"
"The Jesuit Bollandist Peeters and Maurice Winternitz, Professor of Indian Philology and Ethnology at the German Unive…"
"This statement is patently absurd in the face of the evidence of the Acts itself. Mylapore has never been “a desert c…"
"There is simply nothing Indian, much less South Indian, in the setting and ambiance of the Acts of Thomas. All intern…"
"C.B. Firth could have included the testimony of Origen’s teacher, the Greek missionary theologian Clement of Alexandr…"
"But Clement, Origen and Eusebius are not the only early Christian scholars to say that St. Thomas went to Parthia. Th…"