"It was only in the nineteenth century that Western Indologists and Christian missionaries separated the Buddhists, the Jains, and the Sikhs from the Hindus who, in their turn, were defined as only those subscribing to Brahmanical sects.... Nowhere in the voluminous Muslim chronicles do we find the natives of this country known by a name other than Hindu. There were some Jews, and Christians, and Zoroastrians settled here and there... The chronicles distinguish these communities from the Muslims on the one hand, and from the natives of this country on the other. It is only when they come to the natives that no more distinctions are noticed; all natives are identified as ahl-i-Hunûd-Hindu!... In all their narratives, all natives are attacked as Hindus, massacred as Hindus, plundered as Hindus, converted forcibly as Hindus, captured and sold in slave markets as Hindus, and subjected to all sorts of malice and molestation as Hindus. The Muslims never came to know, nor cared to know, as to which temple housed what idol. For them all temples were Hindu but-khãnas, to be desecrated or destroyed as such. They never bothered to distinguish the idol of one God or Goddess from that of another. All idols were broken or burnt by them as so many buts, or deposited in the royal treasury if made of precious metals, or strewn at the door-steps of the mosques if fashion from inferior stuff. In like manner, all priests and monks, no matter to what school or order they belonged, were for the Muslims so many “wicked Brahmans” to be slaughtered or molested as such. In short, the word “Hindu” acquired a religious connotation for the first time within the frontiers of this country. The credit for this turn-out goes to the Muslim conquerors. With the coming of Islam to this country all schools and sects of Sanãtana Dharma acquired a common denominator - Hindu!... Once again, it goes to the credit of the Muslim conquerors that the word “Hindu” acquired a national connotation within the borders of this country."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
S.R. Goel in Shourie, A., & Goel, S. R. (1993). Hindu temples: What happened to them. Vol. II
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Indian_religions
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Indian religions
19 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Indian religions →
Related Quotes
"This Hindu conception of deity is contrary to that held by the Judeo-Christian tradition, where the blurring of the d…"
"Contrary to the Islamic and Judeo-Christian traditions, history has no metaphysical significance for either Hinduism …"
"The religions whose theology is least preoccupied with events in time and most concerned with eternity, have been con…"
"The one idea the Hindu religions differ in from every other in the world, the one idea to express which the sages alm…"
"Caste is real. The working class is real. Being a Naga is real. But ‘India is just a geographical expression!’ Simila…"
"The Semitic religions are not religions in the Eastern sense of the term. Their thrust is towards outward expansion, …"
"This is not an idealization but a firm reality : no matter what the "evils of Hindu society" may have been, subjectin…"
"The BJP’s India was one where Hindus had lived in harmony with each other until outsiders—Muslims and then the Britis…"
"The dharmic traditions do not transmit knowledge, values and experience by cultivating a collective and absolute hist…"
"I do not regard Jainism or Buddhism as separate from Hinduism. Hinduism believes in the oneness not of merely all hum…"