"Overall, the picture that emerges from British political history is clear. Beginning in 1832, when Britain was governed by the relatively rich, primarily rural aristocracy, strategic concessions were made during an eighty-six-year period to adult men. These concessions were aimed at incorporating the previously disenfranchised into politics because the alternative was seen to be social unrest, chaos, and possibly revolution. The concessions were gradual because, in 1832, social peace could be purchased by buying off the middle classes. Moreover, the effect of the concessions was diluted by the specific details of political institutions, particularly the continuing unrepresentative nature of the House of Lords. Although challenged during the 1832 reforms, the House of Lords provided an important bulwark for the wealthy against the potential of radical reforms emanating from a democratized House of Commons. This was so at least until just before the First World War, when the showdown with Herbert Asquith’s Liberal government over the introduction of elements of a welfare state led to substantial limitations of the power of the Lords. After 1832, as the working classes reorganized through the Chartist movement and later the trade unions, further concessions had to be made. The Great War and the fallout from it sealed the final offer of full democracy. Although the pressure of the disenfranchised was more influential in some reforms than others, and other factors undoubtedly played a role, the threat of social disorder was the driving force behind the creation of democracy in Britain. The emergence of democracy in Britain and its subsequent consolidation took place in a society that had long shed nearly all the remnants of medieval organization and that had successfully resisted the threat of absolutism. They also took place in the context of rapid industrialization, urbanization, expansion of the factory system, rising inequality, and – in the period after the Repeal of the Corn Laws – rapid globalization of the economy."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Daron Acemoglu and James A. Robinson, Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (2006)
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/House_of_Lords
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
House of Lords
17 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by House of Lords →
Related Quotes
"Fairly well, but it is like talking to a lot of tombstones."
"By the Constitution of this United Kingdom, the House of Lords is the Court of Appeal in the last resort, and its dec…"
"My Lords, if I know anything of the constitutional value of this House, it is to interpose a salutary obstacle to ras…"
"Why should five hundred or six hundred titled persons govern us, and why should their children govern our children fo…"
"The House of Lords, in rejecting the Budget which provides for the national expenditure of the year, are refusing, fo…"
"The House of Lords have only been tolerated all these years because they were thought to be in a comatose condition w…"
"I’m all for abolishing the House of Lords myself, personally. I think it’s totally past its sell-by date as an instit…"
"The question will be asked, "Should 500 men, ordinary men, chosen accidentally from among the unemployed, override th…"
"You must handle [the House of Lords] a little more firmly, and the time has come for unflinching and resolute action.…"
"But they have not rejected the Budget; they have only referred it to the people. On what principle do they refer Bill…"