"Throughout the period of the Sultanate of Delhi, Islam was the religion of the State. It was considered to be the duty of the Sultan and his government to defend and uphold the principles of this religion and to propagate them among the masses ... even the most enlightened among them [the Sultans], like Muhammad bin Tughlaq, upheld the principles of their faith and refused permission to repair Hindu (or Buddhist) temples.... Thus even during the reign of the so-called liberal-minded Sultans, the Hindus had no permission to build new temples or to repair old ones. Throughout the period, they were known as dhimmis, that is, people living under guarantee, and the guarantee was that they would enjoy restricted freedom in following their religion if they paid the jizya. The dhimmis were not to celebrate their religious rites openly ... and never to do any propaganda on behalf of their religion. A number of disabilities were imposed upon them in matters of State employment and enjoyment of civic rights.... It was a practice with the Sultans to destroy the Hindu temples and images therein. Firoz Tghlaq and Sikander Lodi prohibited Hindus from bathing at the ghats [river bank steps for ritual bathers] in the sacred rivers, and encouraged them in every possible way to embrace the Muslim religion. The converts were exempted from the jizya and given posts in the State service and even granted rewards in cash, or by grant of land. In short, there was not only no real freedom for the Hindus to follow their religion, but the state followed a policy of intolerance and persecution. The contemporary Muslim chronicles abound in detailed descriptions of desecration of images and destruction of temples and of the conversion of hundreds and thousands of the Hindus. [Hindu] religious buildings and places bear witness to the iconoclastic zeal of the Sultans and their followers. One has only to visit Ajmer, Mathura, Ayodhya, Banaras and other holy cities to see the half broken temples and images of those times with their heads, faces, hands and feet defaced and demolished."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Related Quotes
"Islamic law was far from monolithic, with different schools providing competing accounts. Nevertheless, it was agreed…"
"The continued dynamism of successive Islamic societies produced fresh bouts of conquest that led to new sources of sl…"
"Seeing the canonization that success had brought to this magnificent thief, other Moslem rulers profited by his examp…"
"It is in the nature of governments to degenerate; for power, as Shelley said, poisons every hand that touches it. The…"
"There was persecution, partly religious and partly political, and a stubborn resistance was offered by the Hindus… Th…"
"[The Sultanate of Delhi] “was an Islamic State, pure and simple, and gave no religious toleration to the Hindus… and …"
"After the Delhi Sultanate had been set up, India found itself within the cultural orbit of the so-called Moslem world…"
"The popular notion that after the conquest of Muhammad Ghauri, India formed a Muslim Empire under various dynasties, …"
"THE FIRST THREE centuries of Turkish rule in India exhibit a “similarity to the course of human life with its three s…"
"Particularly the Delhi Sultanate was hardly a functioning empire but rather an uneasy foreign occupation, with the oc…"