"The structure of American pluralism and the nature of the Hindu traditions give rise to two options. These options present themselves as routes that can be traveled by the NRI community in the coming years. On the one hand, the pagan traditions of India could renounce their true nature and transform themselves into variants of biblical religion. Then they will soon fit in as well in the American model of pluralism as the Jews and Muslims. On the other hand, these pagan traditions can remain true to their nature and explicitly represent themselves as completely different from the religions of the book. Then they will turn into a major challenge to American pluralism: the very structure of this model will require rethinking in order to accommodate the Hindu traditions. Currently, the NRI community is succumbing to the first option. It has accepted the American model of pluralism as the structure to which it should adapt itself. This could be seen very clearly in the California textbook controversy. A limited number of foundations have been appointed (or have appointed themselves) as the representatives of the Hindu traditions in the U.S.: the Hindu American Foundation and the Vedic Foundation are most prominent. These foundations play according to the rules of the notions of church and religion that are intrinsic to American pluralism. They challenge the unfair portrayal of the Hindu traditions in the American educational system. But they do so in a manner which advances the transformation of these traditions into inferior variants of Christianity. They intend to present the true doctrines of Hinduism and do so by making it look respectable to American Protestants. That is, the many devatas are transformed into different ways of worshiping the one true God. Hinduism becomes a proper monotheistic faith. A variety of pagan Indian traditions are excluded because they are embarrassing to the sanitized biblical model of American pluralism. These Hindu foundations have become the representatives of the ‘Hindu church’ in America: they will decide the true nature of the Hindu traditions for the American public. The way they are going, however, they will end up with a secularized variant of the old biblical understanding of the Hindu traditions as false religion."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
ControversiesEducation in the United States21st century in CaliforniaHinduism and other religionsHinduism in the United States
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Jakob De Roover, FACING THE CHALLENGE OF AMERICAN PLURALISM ON THE FUTURE OF THE NRI COMMUNITY 2007
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/California_textbook_controversy_over_Hindu_history
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
California textbook controversy over Hindu history
7 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by California textbook controversy over Hindu history →
Related Quotes
"Disparity of treatment between Hinduism and other Faiths in these textbooks is the key issue here."
"There is an incessant and even anachronistic dwelling on the negatives of Hinduism, which seems to have been singled …"
"A Muslim or a Christian person is termed a religious fundamentalist if he or she participates in initiatives that adv…"
"Now is the time for the NRI community to choose its leadership carefully. It needs people who are aware of the depth …"
"But on Truschke’s own side, the dividing line between bullies and academics is not so neat. Why stoop to street bully…"
"During the cold part of 2005-2006, the Hindu community in the USA livd in expectation of a school history textbook re…"
"The American people rose up in a historic election in November of 2024 and they told Washington DC they have had enou…"
"But–this is fucking nuts, right? Guy's been in office less than a month, and he's already renaming bodies of water an…"
"This is all exhausting, and exposes the Gulf of America. Not the body of water. The real Gulf of America is the gap b…"
"The general opinion among educated people, widely expressed, was to condemn all attempts at book-banning. To be sure,…"