"Subsequently, during the early medieval period (eleventh - twelfth century A. D.) a huge structure, nearly 50 m in north-south orientation was constructed... On the remains of the above structure was constructed a massive structure with at least three structural phases and three successive floors attached with it. The architectural members of the earlier short lived massive structure with stencil cut foliage pattern and other decorative motifs were reused in the Construction of the monumental structure having a huge pillared hall (or two halls) which is different from residential structures, providing sufficient evidence of a construction of public usage which remained under existence for a long time during the period VII (Medieval-Sultanate level - twelfth to sixteenth century A. D.) It was over the top of this construction during the early sixteenth century, the disputed structure was constructed directly resting over it.â The Hon'ble High Court, in order to get sufficient archaeological evidence on the issue involved âwhether there was any temple/structure which was demolished and mosque was constructed on the disputed siteâ.., had given directions to the Archaeological Survey of India to excavate at the disputed site where the GPR Survey has suggested evidence of anomalies which could be structure, pillars, foundation walls, slab flooring etc. which could be confirmed by excavation . Now, viewing in totality and taking into account the archaeological evidence of a massive structure just below the structure and evidence of continuity in structural phases from the tenth century onwards upto the construction of the disputed structure alongwith the yield of stone and decorated bricks as well as mutilated sculpture of divine couple and carved architectural' members including foliage patterns, âmalaka [a fruit motif], kâpotapâlĂŽ [a âdovecotâ frieze or cornice] doorjamb with semi-circular pilaster, broken octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus motif, circular shrine having pranâla (waterchute) in the north, fifty pillar bases in association of the huge structure, are indicative of remains which are distinctive features found associated with the temples of north India.â"
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
ASI Report 2003, Archaeological Society of India. Quoted from Elst, Koenraad (2012). The argumentative Hindu. New Delhi : Aditya Prakashan. Chapter: Ayodhyaâs three history debates.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Archaeology_of_Ayodhya
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Archaeology of Ayodhya
43 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Archaeology of Ayodhya â
Related Quotes
"Excavation at the disputed site of Rama JanmabhĂšmi-Babri Masjid was carried out by the Archaeological Survey of IndiaâŚ"
"But the dominant position certainly is to minimize the importance of the ASI findings. This is a general phenomenon iâŚ"
"Subsequently, during the early medieval period (eleventh-twelfth century A.D.) a huge structure, nearly 50 m in northâŚ"
"âOur excavations in Ayodhya in 1978 proved the existence of a temple dating to the 11th century. The ASI report just âŚ"
"âAmong the structures listed in the report are several brick walls âin east-west orientationâ, several âin north-soutâŚ"
"Archaeological findings in Prof. B.B. Lalâs excavation campaign Archaeology of the Ramayana Sites 1975-80 and more reâŚ"
"There is ample archaeological evidence that the whole Ramkot hill was covered with a temple complex, as is only to beâŚ"
"In the 1970s, an ASI team led by Prof. B.B. Lal dug out some trenches just outside the mosque and found rows of pillaâŚ"
"Isnât that funny: people wearing the mantle of the academic quest for knowledge who denounce the search for knowledgeâŚ"
"âIn conclusion, the GPR survey reflects in general a variety of anomalies ranging from 0.5 to 5.5 metres in depth thaâŚ"