"They who are acquainted with the present state of the theory of Symbolical Algebra, are aware that the validity of the processes of analysis does not depend upon the interpretation of the symbols which are employed, but solely upon the laws of their combination. Every system of interpretation which does not affect the truth of the relations supposed, is equally admissible, and it is thus that the same process may, under one scheme of interpretation, represent the solution of a question on the properties of numbers, under another, that of a geometrical problem, and under a third, that of a problem of dynamics or optics. ... It has happened in every known form of analysis, that the elements to be determined have been conceived as measurable by comparison with some fixed standard. The predominant idea has been that of magnitude, or more strictly of numerical ratio. The expression of magnitude, or of operations upon magnitude, has been the express object for which the symbols of Analysis have been invented, and for which their laws have been investigated. Thus the abstractions of the modern Analysis, not less than the ostensive diagrams of the ancient Geometry, have encouraged the notion that Mathematics are essentially, as well as actually, the Science of Magnitude. ... [T]his conclusion is by no means necessary. If every existing interpretation is shewn to involve the idea of magnitude, it is only by induction that we can assert that no other interpretation is possible. ...The history of pure Analysis is, it may be said, too recent to permit us to set limits to the extent of its applications. ...That to the existing forms of Analysis a quantitative interpretation is assigned, is the result of the circumstances by which those forms were determined, and is not to be construed into a universal condition of Analysis. It is upon the foundation of this general principle, that I purpose to establish the Calculus of Logic, and that I claim for it a place among the acknowledged forms of Mathematical Analysis, regardless that in its object and in its instruments it must at present stand alone."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
George Boole, The Mathematical Analysis of Logic (1847) Introduction, pp. 3-4.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Abstraction_(mathematics)
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Abstraction (mathematics)
12 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Abstraction (mathematics) →
Related Quotes
"[M]ental Abstraction... is not [only the] Property of Mathematics, but is common to all Sciences. For every Science c…"
"[W]hile we put number into objects, on the other hand we derive our idea of number only from the presence of the worl…"
"The chemist, in describing some mineral, may present all its attributes, color mass, density, volume, molecular const…"
"Change of state involves what is meant by the word "time," which, like space, is a necessary condition for thought, o…"
"Geometry can in no way be viewed... as a branch of mathematics, instead, geometry relates to something already given …"
"Abstraction is the immediate ulterior result of analysis. We may speak of the analysis of the mathematical whole, and…"
"The word element is a term which frequently occurs in philosophy. It signifies any of those parts of an object into w…"
"It was only in the nineteenth century that the winds of change started to blow. First, the introduction of abstract g…"
"Berkeley Bishop of Cloyne was a man of first-rate talents, distinguished as a metaphysician, a philosopher, and a div…"
"Ordinary language is totally unsuited for expressing what physics really asserts, since the words of everyday life ar…"