First Quote Added
April 10, 2026
Latest Quote Added
"2 Jeff Q (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC). I respect Amis, but I just don't feel this has the impact expected of a "9/11" quote."
"3 InvisibleSun 17:00, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"
"2 hydnjo talk 17:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC). If there are no words for 9/11 then we're in real trouble when the really bad happens."
"2 hydnjo talk 17:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC). A bit idealistic at the beginning which dampens the ending punch. -->"
"1 3~ Kalki 21:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC) Though I totally agree with the observation, I would prefer to use this on another anniversary, such as that of the Trinity tests (16 July), or the Hiroshima bombing (6 August). ~ Kalki 15:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"
"3 -4- hydnjo talk 13:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"
"3 ~ Jeff Q (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"
"2 InvisibleSun 17:00, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"
"1 Zarbon 22:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC) -->"
"3 Zarbon 20:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)"
"3 Kalki 13:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC) with a strong lean toward 4, but I would trim it to simply begin at "On September 11, 2001, the world fractured..." -->"
"1 Zarbon 17:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC) -->"
"2 3~ Kalki 21:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC) there remains a mixture of validity and irony in this statement, but I am less inclined than previously to use it, because the ironies clearly have become stronger. ~ Kalki 15:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"
"3 User:Warrior-Poet 10 September, 2005 10:25(CST)"
"1 hydnjo talk 13:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"
"1 ~ Jeff Q (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"
"1 22:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)"
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)3 Kalki (talk · contributions) 10:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC) with a very strong lean toward 4. -->"
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 07:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC) 3 Kalki 00:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 3 Kalki 00:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC) but would now extend this to the entire first paragraph of the novel:"
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 3 Kalki 00:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."
"This unsigned proposal was made by"
"0 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 07:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC) 1 Kalki 23:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC) this might be acceptable as a QOTD on a date related to Maher, but I do not consider it an acceptable QOTD for any anniversary of the attack. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 07:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC)"
"2 Zarbon 22:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)"
"4 Putting things into context, if the Americans in the Revolution had done the same in order to win, we would be celebrating their Bravery --JayStander 02:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)"
"2 Kalki 00:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)"
"3 because fighting for the sake of fighting alone is a waste. Zarbon 04:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"
"1 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"
"3 because it takes courage to assume responsibility. Zarbon 04:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"
"1 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC) with a lean toward 2."
"3 because talking alone will not solve problems, actions sometimes speak louder than words. Zarbon 04:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"
"3 because a battle against terrorism is one that the entire planet is fighting. Zarbon 04:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"
"2 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"
"3 bystander (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC) with a lean to 4"
"4 because a terrorist has no loyalty to any land and absolutely no loyalty to any people. Zarbon 04:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"
"1 because when I read the quote I get the sense that it can too easily be taken multiple ways. It can be saying that terrorists are people who fight only for themselves and their own greed, which I think is the speaker being a bit presumptuous or it can mean that terrorists are not all fighting for one country or one cause insinuating that fighting one country or cause won't get rid of them. --JayStander 07:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)"
"1 Kalki (talk · contributions) 19:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC) * 2 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"
"1 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Needs better sourcing"
"2 Zarbon 22:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"
"3 Kalki 13:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC) * 4 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."
"1 Zarbon 22:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"
"2.5 Ningauble 00:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC) (with apologies for nominating a pun)"
"2 Zarbon 17:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)"
"2 Kalki 16:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)"
"3 Artofwar"
"2 Kalki 02:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)"
"3 tab1of2 23:11, 1 September 2010 (EST)"
"2 Kalki (talk · contributions) 19:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)"
"improperly placed on page as if it were 2011 selection on 2011·09·13 by IP"
"1 Kalki (talk · contributions) 23:23, 13 September 2011 (UTC) acceptable as a suggestion, but have no real interest in using this as QOTD."
Young though he was, his radiant energy produced such an impression of absolute reliability that Hedgewar made him the first sarkaryavah, or general secretary, of the RSS.
- Gopal Mukund Huddar
Largely because of the influence of communists in London, Huddar's conversion into an enthusiastic supporter of the fight against fascism was quick and smooth. The ease with which he crossed from one worldview to another betrays the fact that he had not properly understood the world he had grown in.
Huddar would have been 101 now had he been alive. But then centenaries are not celebrated only to register how old so and so would have been and when. They are usually celebrated to explore how much poorer our lives are without them. Maharashtrian public life is poorer without him. It is poorer for not having made the effort to recall an extraordinary life.
I regret I was not there to listen to Balaji Huddar's speech [...] No matter how many times you listen to him, his speeches are so delightful that you feel like listening to them again and again.
By the time he came out of Franco's prison, Huddar had relinquished many of his old ideas. He displayed a worldview completely different from that of the RSS, even though he continued to remain deferential to Hedgewar and maintained a personal relationship with him.