First Quote Added
April 10, 2026
Latest Quote Added
"3 Kalki 23:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC) -->"
"2 Zarbon 04:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)"
"4 UDScott 15:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)"
"3.5 Ningauble 21:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"3 InvisibleSun 22:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC) -->"
"3 UDScott 15:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)"
"4 * 3 Kalki 07:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"2 - Zarbon 15:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"3 Zarbon 15:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"3 bystander (talk) 22:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC) -->"
"1 Zarbon 04:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)"
"3 Ningauble 21:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki·⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 01:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC) 3 Kalki 07:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."
"2 InvisibleSun 22:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC) -->"
"3 UDScott 15:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki·⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:24, 7 March 2015 (UTC) 2 Kalki 07:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"2 but rather long. Zarbon 05:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)"
"3 UDScott 15:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC) - but I would trim it to the last sentence."
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki·⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 00:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC) 3 Kalki 07:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC) with a lean toward 4 but would trim it to begin at "The computer and its information cannot answer any of the fundamental questions we need to address...""
"3 bystander (talk) 22:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC) I like the quote but agree that it is lengthy and cumbersome. -->"
"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki·⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 09:22, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 2 Kalki 07:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC) with a lean toward 3."
"2 bystander (talk) 22:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC) Possibly best reserved for another day."
"2 Zarbon 05:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)"
"2 Kalki 07:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"3 Zarbon 05:09, 4 March 2009 (UTC)"
"1 bystander (talk) 22:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC) While the advancement of science may have provided the means for the weapons, it is man who made them. The argument against science is misplaced."
"3 Kalki 07:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC) with a lean toward 4, but would prefer an extended version which has been sourced:"
"– (un-sourced) Ningauble 21:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"1 Kalki 07:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"1 InvisibleSun 22:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"0 bystander (talk) 22:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC) Eugenics is possibly one of the darkest sciences man has ever created. Heed should be paid to the quotes that bracket this one."
"2. Would start at "There are many..." InvisibleSun 22:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)"
"3 Kalki (talk · contributions) 22:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC)"
"3 Kalki (talk · contributions) 22:44, 3 March 2010 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."
"3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki·⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 01:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)"
Young though he was, his radiant energy produced such an impression of absolute reliability that Hedgewar made him the first sarkaryavah, or general secretary, of the RSS.
- Gopal Mukund Huddar
Largely because of the influence of communists in London, Huddar's conversion into an enthusiastic supporter of the fight against fascism was quick and smooth. The ease with which he crossed from one worldview to another betrays the fact that he had not properly understood the world he had grown in.
Huddar would have been 101 now had he been alive. But then centenaries are not celebrated only to register how old so and so would have been and when. They are usually celebrated to explore how much poorer our lives are without them. Maharashtrian public life is poorer without him. It is poorer for not having made the effort to recall an extraordinary life.
I regret I was not there to listen to Balaji Huddar's speech [...] No matter how many times you listen to him, his speeches are so delightful that you feel like listening to them again and again.
By the time he came out of Franco's prison, Huddar had relinquished many of his old ideas. He displayed a worldview completely different from that of the RSS, even though he continued to remain deferential to Hedgewar and maintained a personal relationship with him.