History of trigonometry

"Similarly to the spread of the Indian place-value system, Indian trigonometry came to Europe via the Arab world, for example through the work on astronomy and trigonometry of Abu Abdallah Mohammad ibn Jabir al-Battani (ca. 850–929), also known as Albategnius, whose Kitab al-Zij was translated into Latin."

"[I]n 1575 Western Europe had recovered most of the major mathematical works of antiquity now extant. Arabic algebra had been... mastered and improved... through the solution of the cubic and quartic and through... partial... symbolism; and trigonometry had become an independent discipline. The time was almost ripe for rapid strides... The transition from the Renaissance to the modern world was... made through... intermediate figures, a few of the more important... Galileo Galilei... and ... from Italy; several... as .., Thomas Harriot.., and ... were English; two... Simon Stevin... and ... were Flemish; others came from varied lands—John Napier... from Scotland, Jobst Bürgi... from Switzerland, and Johann Kepler... from Germany."

"At its higher levels the golden age of Muslim civilization was both an immense scientific success and a exceptional revival of ancient philosophy. These were not its only triumphs... but they eclipse the rest. ...[T]he Saracens ...made the most original contributions [to science]. These, in brief, were nothing less than trigonometry and algebra... In trigonometry the Muslims invented the sine and the tangent. The Greeks had measured an angle only from the chord of the arc it subtended: the sine was half the chord. The Chosranian (...Mohammed Ibn-Musa) published in 820 an algebraic treatise which went as far as quadratic equations: translated into Latin in the sixteenth century, it became a primer for the West. Later, Muslim mathematicians resolved biquadratic equations. Equally distinguished were Islam's mathematical geographers, its astronomical observatories and instruments (in particular the ) and its excellent if still imperfect measurements of and , correcting the flagrant errors of Ptolemy."

"As in the rest of mathematical sciences, so in trigonometry, were the Arabs pupils of the Hindus…"

"Euler wrote... Introductio in Analysin infinitorum, 1748, which was intended to serve as an introduction to pure analytical mathematics. ...He ...showed that the trigonometrical and exponential functions are connected by the relation \cos \theta + i \sin \theta = e^{i\theta}. Here too we meet the symbol e used to denote the base of the Naperian logarithms, namely the incommensurable number 2.7182818... The use of the single symbol to denote the incommensurable number 2.7182818... seems to be due to Cotes, who denoted it by M. Newton was probably the first to employ the literal exponential notation, and Euler using the form a'z, had taken a as the base of any system of logarithms. It is probable that the choice of e for a particular base was determined by its being a vowel consecutive to a, or, still more probable because e is the initial of the word exponent."

"The development of Indian trigonometry, based on sine as against chord of the Greeks was another of 's achievements which was necessary for astronomical calculations. Because of his own concise notation, he could express the full sine table in just one couplet, which students could easily remember. For preparing the table of sines, he gave two methods, one of which was based on the property that the second order sine differences were proportional to sines themselves."

"The second part of the book... contains an exposition of the first principles of the theory of complex quantities; hitherto, the very elements of this theory have not been easily accessible to the English student, except recently in Prof. Chrystal's excellent treatise on Algebra. The subject of Analytical Trigonometry has been too frequently presented to the student in the state in which it was left by Euler, before the researches of Cauchy, Abel, Gauss, and others, had placed the use of imaginary quantities, and especially the theory of infinite series and products, where real or complex quantities are involved, on a firm scientific basis. In the Chapter on the exponential theorem and logarithms, I have ventured to introduce the term "generalized logarithm" for the doubly infinite series of values of the logarithm of a quantity."

"The idea of the logarithm probably had its source in the use of... trigonometric formulas that transformed multiplication into addition and subtraction. ...[I]f one needed to solve a triangle using the , a multiplication and division were required. ...[C]alculations were long and errors... made. Astronomers realized... multiplication and division could be replaced by additions and subtractions. To accomplish this... sixteenth century astronomers used formulas... as 2 \sin \alpha \sin \beta = cos(\alpha - \beta) - \cos (\alpha + \beta). ...A second source of the... logarithm was probably found in... algebraists as Stifel and Chuquet, who both displayed tables relating the powers of 2 to the exponents and showed that multiplication in one table corresponded to addition in the other. But because these tables had large gaps, they could not be used for necessary calculations. ...[T]wo men... independently, the Scot John Napier... and the Swiss Jobst Bürgi... came up with the idea of producing an extensive table... to multiply any... numbers... (not just powers of 2)... Napier published... first."

"We know that the trigonometric sine is not mentioned by Greek mathematicians and astronomers, that it was used in India from the Gupta period onwards... The only conclusion possible is that the use of sines is an Indian development and not a Greek one. But Tannery, persuaded that the Indians could not have made any mathematical inventions, preferred to assume that the sine was a Greek idea not adopted by Hipparchus, who gave only a cable of chords. For Tannery, the fact that the Indians knew of sines was sufficient proof that they must have heard about them from the Greeks."

"Although the Arabs did not contribute much original matter to algebra they vitalized it and enriched its contents by applying algebraic operations to the problems of Greek geometry and to their own problems in astronomy and trigonometry. This led them directly to numerical higher equations."

"Now, it is worth remarking, that this property of the table of sines, which has been so long known in the East, was not observed by the mathematicians of Europe till about two hundred years ago […] If we were not already acquainted withthe high antiquity of the astronomy of Hindostan, nothing could appear more singular than to find a system of trigonometry, so perfect in its principles, in a book so ancient as the Surya Siddhanta […]’ ‘In the progress of science […] the invention of trigonometry is to be considered as a step of great importance, and of considerable difficulty. It is an application of arithmetic to geometry […] (and) a little reflection will convince us, that he, who first formed the idea of exhibiting, in arithmetical tables, the ratios of the sides and angles of all possible triangles, and contrived the means of constructing such tables, must have been a man of profound thought, and of extensive knowledge. However, ancient, therefore, any book may be, in which we meet with a system of trigonometry, we may be assured, that it was not written in the infancy of science.’ ‘As we cannot, therefore, suppose the art of trigonometrical calculation to have been introduced till after a long preparation of other acquisitions, both geometrical and astronomical, we must reckon far back from the date of the Surya Siddhanta, before we come to the origin of the mathematical sciences in India […] Even among the Greeks […] an interval, of at least 1000 years, elapsed from the first observations in astronomy, to the invention of trigonometry; and we have surely no reason to suppose, that the progress of knowledge has been more rapid in other countries."

"Why should the typical student be interested in those wretched triangles? ...He is to be brought to see that without the knowledge of triangles there is not trigonometry; that without trigonometry we put back the clock millennia to Standard Darkness Time and antedate the Greeks."

"The sum and difference formulas are vital to building trigonometric tables finer than the traditional 24 entries per 90°. ...they can also be used to generate many other identities. In particular, formulas for Sin 2θ, Cos 2θ, Sin 3θ, Cos 3θ, and higher multiples may be generated simply by writing nθ = θ + θ +... + θ and applying the sum formulas repeatedly. This was done by... Kamalākara in his Siddhānta-Tattva-Viveka (1658) up to the sine and cosine of 5θ; he quotes (who clearly knew this could be done) for the addition and subtraction laws. Kamalākara's sine triple-angle formula...was \mathrm{Sin} 3 \theta = \mathrm{Sin} \theta (3 - \frac{( \mathrm{Sin} \theta)^2}{(\mathrm{Sin}\,30^{\circ })^2}),equivalent to the modern formula \sin 3\theta = 3 \sin \theta - 4 \sin^3 \theta; ...The identity ...has special significance, since it may be used to get an accurate estimate of sin 1° from sin 3°—provided one is able to solve cubic equations."

"After Apollonius Greek mathematics came to a dead stop. It is true that there were some epigones, such as Diocles and Zenodorus... But apart from trigonometry, nothing great nothing new appeared. The geometry of the conics remained in the form Apollonius gave it, until Descartes. ...The "Method" of Archimedes was lost sight of, and the problem of integration remained where it was, until it was attacked anew in the 17th century... Germs of projective geometry were present, but it remained for Desargues and Pascal to bring these to fruition. ...Higher plane curves were studied only sporadically... Geometric algebra and the theory of proportions were carried over into modern times as inert traditions, of which the inner meaning was no longer understood. The Arabs started algebra anew, from a much more primitive point of view... Greek geometry had run into a blind alley."

"The British mathematicians have been the greatest, nay... the only improvers of Trigonometry within these two centuries. ...[N]ot to mention the extraordinary inventions of Lord Neper... nor the analogies, wherein sines and tangents of half-arches are used, nor the applications of Trigonometry to of the sphere, for all which we are indebted... the very words of Trigonometry, cosine, cotangent, &c. have been first used by the writers of that nation."

"The most conspicuous authors of both Trigonometries amongst the British, who have been consulted by us, are Caswell, in Wallis's Works, Keil, Simpson, Robertson, Mr. , Emerson, and [Benjamin] Martin; and of those who have treated of them occasionally, Oughtred, in his Clavis Mathematica, and Circles of Proportion, Wallis, Jones, Wingate, [Henry] Sherwin, and Gardiner, in their Tables of Logarithms; Sir Isaac Newton, in his Univ. Arithm. Geometrical Problem II. Harris and Chambers in their dictionaries. Plane Trigonometry alone has been treated by [Philip] Ronayne, Mr. Thomas Simpson, Maseres, and Muller. However, the merits of some foreigners also cannot, without injustice, be suppressed. Such are Copernicus, in his Astronomia Instaurata; Balanus, a modern Greek; Simon Stevin, commented upon by '; Clavius; M. de la Caille; M. de la Lande, in his Astronomie, tom. III. de Chales; Ozanam; Segnerus; and the labours of Schottus, Tacquet, and others, are commendable. We need not mention the parents of these sciences, Theodosius, Ptolemy, Menelaus, and ."

"[N]otwithstanding the labours and exertions of so many eminent men... in this branch of mathematics many things are deficient, many superfluous; some are too general, others too particular; some are too much dwelt upon, others want a great deal of explanation; in many there is hardly any order, or connexion, or demonstration, in some too much unnecessary precision."

"[W]hat else... the reason of doubts arising in solutions... of plane and spherical triangles, but the want of accurate determinations and explanations?"

"From what have proceeded disputes in Spherical Trigonometry, not solved either by Cunn, or Ham, but from the inaccurate notion of a supplemental triangle?"

"[T]o what can this be owing, but to the want of sufficient principles, the neglect of enumerating and distinguishing: cases of a proposition, and the inattention to rendering the subject as complete as possible?"

"[T]here is as yet no classical book of Trigonometry in any language... fit to give to learners a solid foundation in them... as are Euclids Elements, Archimedes de Sphaera et Cylindro, and Dr. Hamiltons Conic Sections."

"[T]he reason, why in Algebra and Fluxions, expressions for trigonometrical lines always run out into infinite series... is because the number of arches, to which any one of such lines belongs is always infinite."

"Prop. 14. and its corollaries deserve... examination. It is hard to say, by whom they were invented, though... probably by the English; and perhaps corr. 3 & 2. of prop. 29. in spherics, have given rise to them all, as they are to be found in most books of the last age. They are all to be seen in Caswell... Wallace, Newton Univ. Arithm. Geom. Probl. 11. Thos. Simpsons Algebra, Geom. Probl. 15. Dr. Robertsons Navigation, Emerson, and [Benjamin] Martin. The analogy of the prop. in particular, is to be met with in Trigonometria Britannica, [Henry] Sherwins Tables, de la Caille, Dr. Simpson, and Ward."

"With regard to demonstration, the old and perplexed one (used formerly for the area of a triangle, and accommodated here by Dr. Simpson) is laid aside, and another... easier demonstration is substituted... after the manner of Dr. Robertson's, but greatly improved by the change of a side of the triangle; the same indeed nearly, which has been communicated in Russia some years ago by... Professor Robison of Glasgow."

"But in Book II. i.e. in Spherical Trigonometry, the greatest pains were to be taken, and the greatest difficulties to be overcome. For though... Spherical Trigonometry is not so easy as the Plane, as it wants those previous helps and that determination, which the Plane... has; yet, when out of three parts of a proposition one only or two are laid down; when a proposition is demonstrated only in one case out of several; when, on account of bad definitions, several things, wanting demonstration, are passed by, or dignified with the name of axioms; when an argument turns in circulo... when whole steps are omitted; when, instead of a direct way, we go round about; when things are scattered about without order; when a whole set of triangles is neglected, &c. &c. surely, all this is not the fault of Spherical Trigonometry."

"The whole doctrine of axes and poles is to this day both incomplete and inaccurate. The authors endeavoured to their utmost, to remedy such extraordinary defects in so important a subject. ...In truth, the subject of poles of circles, as it is laid down here, seems exhausted: several of their properties are exhibited, over and above those in Theodosius's Spherics, and Dr. Barrow's additions thereto; and this is done in a lesser number of lines, than they have pages."

"In prop. 5. and cor. the confused and inaccurate ideas of arches being measures of angles, of arches being equal to angles, and of arches being the supplements and complements of angles, and v. v. so much prevailing even among the best geometricians, are attempted to be rectified: for it is manifest enough, that nothing can be a measure of another thing, or equal to it, or a supplement and complement of it, unless it be homogeneous with it. For want of such a plain consideration, and afterwards most probably from habit, people have debased many propositions, both in their enunciations and demonstrations; and often it is not without some trouble that they are corrected."

"Prop. 7. claims particular notice on account of its use, of its application, and even on account of the disputes it has occasioned. Its application is so... extensive, that the doctrine of spherics, by means only of it, may be reduced almost to half the number of its propositions. The invention of it may be ascribed perhaps to Philip Langsberg. Vid. Simon Stevin Liv. 3. de la Cosmographie, prop. 31. & Alb. Girard in loc. ...[W]e have been obliged to form for it an enunciation entirely new; and were happy to find afterwards, that Mr. Cotes in his Æstim. Error. iem. 4. gives the first part of it exactly the same."

"It is from the vagueness of the proposition... and from misunderstanding the terms supplement and complement, that disputes have arisen in spherics: these may be seen at the end of [Samuel] Cunns Euclid, in his remarks and the appendix. Whatever be the mistakes of Mr. Heynes... the respectable names of Dr. Keil, Mr. Caswell, and Dr. Harris, whom Mr. Cunn joins in company with Heynes, are treated by him... injuriously; especially as he himself had not examined his subject with sufficient attention. His own rule... is indeed true... but it is more troublesome to the memory. Mr. Ham... awards his own rule, which, notwithstanding, is much more unmanageable... it using subtraction of natural versed sines, to whose difference therefore (and every one knows the thing is not easy) logarithms are to be accommodated. But it were time, long ago, to bury these worthless disputes in oblivion, that learners of spherics should not be discouraged by seeing them printed and reprinted so often."

"Of prop. 10. no one gives an accurate demonstration, except Menelaus : Dr. Keil's need not be mentioned, and Dr. Simpson's leaves out a case, and is at the same time very prolix. That which is offered here... seems remarkably short and easy, and is derived from Dr. Simpsons Elements of Euclid, Book XI. prop. A. ...[H]e is... to be praised for his merits in his... Euclid; but... there are still many inaccuracies..."

"Prop. 18 & 19. though... the... foundation of... Spherical Trigonometry... have not been demonstrated... except in one single case... it does not seem... long ago, that they... appear anew in their present form. V. Keil."

"Such weak foundations Spherical Trigonometry has had to this day!"

"The first considerable extension of Trigonometry, beyond its original object, was made about twenty years after the death of Newton. It was then, on the ground-work laid down by that great man, that... Clairaut, Dalembert and Euler, and ... began to establish a system of Physical Astronomy more perfect... [T]hey laid aside the Geometrical method which Newton had used... and adopted the Analytical. ...[T]hey perceived the formulæ of Trigonometry to be of continual use and recurrence, and the language, by which the process of demonstration was conducted... in a great degree, of symbols and phrases borrowed from that science. ...[T]he advancement of Trigonometry, the pure and subsidiary science, was contemporaneous with that of Astronomy, the mixed and principal one."

"Clairaut and Dalembert in their Lunar Theories... introduce... several, now commonly known, Trigonometrical formulæ. In... Thomas Simpson... the Author evidently intended the one... at p. 76, as preparatory to the... Theory of the Moon; and Euler... states as a reason for cultivating the algorithm of sines, its great utility in the mixed Mathematics."

"Spherical [Trigonometry]... has not, like... [plane Trigonometry], been extended beyond its original purpose. It has no collateral and indirect uses; it has not enriched the general language of analysis... But... its propositions are more easily established by the Analytical method than the Geometrical. ...[T]his would be the case, even if there existed no similarity and artificial connexion, between the processes by which the series of formulæ in the two branches of Trigonometry were... established. [T]he corresponding propositions can be deduced by methods so analogous, that to know the one is almost to know the other."

"We shall... find similar Algebraical derivations of formulæ from two fundamental expressions for the cosine of an angle. The principle of the derivation... is not new; it originated with Euler, who inserted in the Acta Acad. Petrop. for 1779, a Memoir entitled Trigonometria Spherica Universa, ex primis principiis breviter et dilucide derivata. Gua next, in the Memoirs of the Academy of Sciences for 1783, p. 291, deduced... Spherical Trigonometry "from the Algebraical solution of the simplest of its Problems." In 1786, Cagnoli... derived fundamental expressions for the sine and cosine of the sum of two arcs. And lastly, Lagrange and Legendre, the one in the Journal de L Ecole Polytechnique, the other in his Elemens de Geometrie, have followed and simplified Euler’s method, and instead of three fundamental expressions, have shewn one to be sufficient."

"Kepler's indefatigable inquiries, for nine years... amounts to this, that Byrgius had made some observations upon the adaptation of an arithmetical to a geometrical progression, very naturally occurring to him in trigonometrical calculations."

"Longomontanus and Byrgius, are all whom Dr Hutton can find to represent his learned calculators of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, who anticipated or coincided with Napier in the discovery. ...But he is contradicted by the history of science... and by every philosopher of greatest name... ...[O]ur philosopher's invention... removed a pressure, long and severely felt, and which might have crushed the temple of science, had that not possessed such a pillar as Kepler. To use the expressions of a distinguished writer, " What all mathematicians were now wishing for, the genius of Neper enabled him to discover; and the invention of Logarithms introduced into the calculations of trigonometry a degree of simplicity and ease, which no man had been so sanguine as to expect." Kepler, Ursine, Speidell, Gunter, Briggs, Vlacq, [Petrus] Cugerus, Cavalieri, Wolff, Wallis, Halley, Keill, and a host of others, all bear witness against Dr Hutton, in the honourable and enthusiastic manner they acknowledge Napier as the only author of that revolution in science."

"In continuation of... the most brilliant period of ancient geometry, the century of Euclid, Archimedes and Apollonius, recourse must again be had to the Collectio of the much later writer Pappus, for information about the lost three books of s of Euclid. ...In the Sphœrica of Menelaus, a geometer and astronomer of the first century A.D., is found the theorem (lib. III. lemma 1 p. 83, Oxon. 1758): If the sides ag, gd, da of a plane triangle be met by any transversal in the points erb respectively, thenge : ea=gr.db : rd.ba,or the product of three non-adjacent segments of the sides of the triangle by any transversal is equal to the product of the remaining three. This was... extended to spherical triangles... as a basis for the spherical trigonometry of the ancients."

"[T]he property of the six segments in plano... [led to] great results... long after, especially in the hands of Desargues."

"Claudius Ptolemseus was "le plus ceélèbre, sans contredit, mais non le plus véritablement grand astronome de toute l'antiquité." [the most famous, without a doubt, but not the truly greatest astronomer of all antiquity] Thus writes Delambre in the Biographie Universelle (vol. 36... 1823)."

"In a work on the three dimensions of bodies, Ptolemy introduced the idea of determining the position of a point in space by referring it to three rectangular axes of coordinates... His chief work, which he called a mathematical Σύνταξις [Syntax], was further described by his admirers as ή μεγύλη, and by the Arabs as ' ή μεγίστη [maximum]... In it... he reproduces the theorem of the six segments... and founds upon it a system of trigonometry, plane and spherical."

"Nicomachus turns to the discussion of proportion... which, he says, is very necessary for "natural science, music, spherical trigonometry and planimetry and particularly for the study of the ancient mathematicians.""

"Of the great Greek mathematicians, Archimedes alone (in his Circuli Dimensio) ventures to introduce actual numbers into a geometrical discussion, and to divide a line by another line. He finds the value of π and some other similar ratios but does not himself pursue such investigations further and is not followed by any other writer. Trigonometry was used only for astronomical purposes and did not form part of geometry at all."

"[T]he word 'geometry'... means 'land-measurement,' that the Egyptians gave this science to the world and that among the Egyptians... it... was confined almost entirely to the practical requirements of the surveyor. The work ["Directions for obtaining the knowledge of all dark things" in the Rhind collection] of ..., contains, beside sums in arithmetic, a great many geometrical examples... Ahmes proceeds to calculate the contents of... receptacles... The rectilineal figures of which Ahmes calculates the areas are the square, oblong, isosceles triangle and isosceles parallel-trapezium (...part of an isosceles triangle cut by a line parallel to the base). As to the last two, the areas... are incorrect. ...The errors in these cases are small... The area of a circle is found (in no. 50) by deducting from the diameter 1/9th of its length and squaring the remainder. Here π is taken = ( \frac{16}{9})^2 = 3.1604..., a... fair approximation. ...Lastly, the papyrus contains (nos. 56 to 60) some examples which seem to imply a rudimentary trigonometry. In these... the problem is to find the uchatebt, piremus or seqt of a pyramid or obelisk."

"[C]oncerning ... The Chaldees... almost contemporaneous with Ahmes... had made advances, similar to the Egyptian, in arithmetic and geometry, and were especially busy with astronomical observations. ...[T]hey had divided the circle into 360 degrees, and... obtained a fairly correct... ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. They used... a notation, which the Greeks afterwards adopted for astronomical purposes. Herodotus expressly states that the polos and ' (...sundials) and the twelve parts of the day were made known to the Greeks from Babylon. Much of the trigonometry and of the later Greeks may... have been... derived from Babylonian sources."

"In 1120, Adelhard of Bath obtained in Spain a copy of Euclid's Elements and translated... into Latin. Translations from the Arabic of other Greek works, especially... Aristotle, soon followed. About 1186 Gherardo of Cremona made another translation of the Elements and... in 1260, Giovanni Campano reproduced Adelhard's translation under his own name and obtained... wide celebrity. The fruit of these translations soon followed. In 1220, Leonardo of Pisa... published... Practica Geometriae which though it deals with the calculation of areas and numerical ratios of spaces, is founded on Euclid and Archimedes and Ptolemy, and contains some trigonometry and conics."

"The century which produced Euclid, Archimedes and Apollonius was... the time at which Greek mathematical genius attained its highest development. For many centuries... geometry remained a favourite study, but no substantive work... compared with the Sphere and Cylinder or the Conics... One great invention, trigonometry, remains to be completed, but trigonometry with the Greeks remained always the instrument of astronomy and was not used in any other branch of mathematics, pure or applied. The geometers who succeed to Apollonius are professors who signalised themselves by this or that pretty little discovery or by some commentary on the classical treatises."

"'... astronomical work, Aναφορικός, does not use the trigonometry which was certainly introduced by Hipparchus, and would have been absurdly antiquated if written after Hipparchus' time..."

"Isaac Newton... went to school at Grantham and in 1661 came up as a subsizar to Trinity. ...He had not read any mathematics before coming into residence but was acquainted with Sanderson's Logic, which was then frequently read as preliminary to mathematics. At the beginning of his first October term he... picked up a book on astrology, but could not understand it on account of the geometry and trigonometry. He therefore bought a Euclid, and was surprised to find how obvious the propositions seemed. He thereupon read Oughtred's Clavis and Descartes's Geometry, the latter of which he managed to master by himself though with some difficulty. The interest he felt in the subject led him to take up mathematics rather than chemistry as a serious study. His subsequent mathematical reading as an undergraduate was founded on Kepler's Optics, the works of Vieta, Schooten's Miscellanies, Descartes's Geometry, and Wallis's Arithmetica infinitorum: he also attended Barrow's lectures. At a later time on reading Euclid more carefully he formed a very high opinion of it as an instrument of education, and he often expressed his regret that he had not applied himself to geometry before proceeding to algebraic analysis. ...He was elected to a scholarship in 1663."