August 30

"1 Zarbon 16:27, 24 April 2008 (UTC)"

"2 InvisibleSun 21:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC) -->"

"3 Kalki 00:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)"

"3 InvisibleSun 21:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC) -->"

"3 121a0012 04:21, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)"

"3 ~ MosheZadka (Talk) 07:18, 20 July 2005 (UTC)"

"2 Zarbon 16:27, 24 April 2008 (UTC)"

"2 Kalki 16:45, 30 August 2005 (UTC) The quote is about an important subject, and might be selected in coming years, perhaps on the centennial of this important discovery. It points to notable facts, familiar to many students of Life's history, but it is also to some extent flawed as a presentation of scientific perspectives. One can agree that "The animals of the Burgess Shale are holy objects..." and they indeed have lessons for us that we should be trying to learn, but they are not "trying to tell us" anything. They simply are forever what they are, within the complex patterns of Eternity and Time, manifestations of the patterns of Life's awareness and being, which we might seek to be ever more aware and appreciative of— but, in keeping with both scientific and rational principles, we should avoid implying purposes or intentions on the part of specimens or of their fossils that are not likely to exist. I have added 4 quotes by this author which I believe superior to this one to the suggestions for the author's birthdate. If this one eventually is used I would prefer to use the entire quote, without ellipses:"

"4 Kalki (talk · contributions) 08:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC) * 3 Kalki 00:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 20:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC) -->"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 12:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC) 3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 20:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."

"3 //Gbern3 (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2013 (UTC) -->"

"3 Zarbon 02:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 21:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC) 3 Kalki 14:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC) but either trimmed of the first sentence to eliminate unspecified declarations, or extended to include them. but would trim the first line, and extend it for context to read:"

"2.5 //Gbern3 (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2013 (UTC) Ditto what Kalki said. -->"

"2 Kalki 00:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC) with a lean toward 3."

"3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 00:08, 29 August 2016 (UTC) 2 Kalki 00:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 00:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC) 2 Kalki 00:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)"

"2 //Gbern3 (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2013 (UTC) -->"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC) — but might trim it a bit… -->"

"3 Kalki 23:58, 29 August 2005 (UTC)"

"3 bystander (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)"

"3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 20:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)"

"1 //Gbern3 (talk) 02:12, 15 August 2013 (UTC) I don't get it."

"2 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 20:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC) with a lean toward 3."

"2 bystander (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2012 (UTC)"

"2 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 20:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)"

"4 Pithy Francoln (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)"

"1 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 21:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC) — I would prefer a quote by Rutherford to honor Rutherford — or even a quote specifically about him."