First Quote Added
April 10, 2026
Latest Quote Added
"So do something that would have worked anyway whether God is real or not, and then simply assume that it worked because God is real. Of course. Thatâs religious logic for you."
"We âunbelieversâ are not a threat; we offer help. Whoever comes away from delusion will be better off. Just ask some of those who already have. Theyâll be happy to help you."
"If you canât show that itâs true, then you canât call it truth. Knowledge is similar to truth in that it a justified belief. Knowledge is demonstrable and testable with measurable accuracy. If you canât demonstrate your knowledge to any degree at all by any means whatsoever then you donât actually know what you think you do, no matter how convinced of it you are. Without evidentiary support, then it is only an empty assertion unworthy of serious consideration."
"There can be no benefit of an exorcism. Itâs not like there could ever be an instance where an actual demon is involved, and a priest would be helpless even in that situation if there were any reality to that. Even if there were some placebo effect to the ritual, it still encourages belief in things that would still persist in the imagination and thus never be fully cured even in the mind of believers. And if the problem stems from any sort of actual mental disorder, then the ritual only postpones or replaces actual medical attention."
"Imagine that you are the creator of the universe. What message would you impart to your people? Whatever your answer, this wouldnât be it. If one could read a passage like this and imagine that these are the words of an actual deity and an infallible genius, then I donât think I could reach such a person to reason with them. I could only pity them. (The reference is to verses 67-70)"
"According to mainstream non-religious sources, a fool is one who too readily accepts improbable assertions from questionable sources on insufficient evidence. So it is no wonder that the Bible and the Qurâan both use the opposite definition, so that the wise are called foolish and only fools are wise. By definition, one would have to be a fool to be fooled by either book. As for âputting things rightâ, the only way to do that is to identify unsupported assertions and examine what the facts really indicate, and that always goes against faith."
"Iâve never heard of any skeptic being exorcised with the intent of debunking the practice. But it sounds like a good idea, and I think I would be an ideal candidate to do that âsince believers often think I look scary anyway."
"So the failure of scripture to describe anything accurately is obfuscated by assuming the conclusion with confirmation bias. Once again it is God who leads the unbelievers astray, and not their desire to understand the world as it is. And even though several of the worldâs richest and most successful, and even the most charitable people are unbelievers, they are still considered losers. Of course the Qurâan is wrong about all these things, and Iâm glad to be back in a country where I am allowed to say that. But those are the sort of lies that religion needs to sell itself."
"A society run by reasonable, rational, educated, objective, skeptical people who know that actions work and prayer doesnât âwould tend to be atheist. Weâve already seen the world run by Christians. Whenever religion has had rule over law, the result has historically always been an automatic violation of human rights and an attack on factual education. So yeah, any Utopia would have to be humanist."
"[In the Qurâan] faith is still defined the same as in the Bible, a belief in what is not seen. This explains why the remaining scripture relies on the logical fallacy of the circular argument routing back to the assumed conclusion. There is nothing that is indicated by evidence, nothing that is verifiably correct, just empty assertions of impossible nonsense that youâre supposed to swallow without question simply because it says so."
"[According to the Qurâan] God will punish me for not believing even though it is his fault that I donât believe. God doesnât need to seal my heart and my ears or cover my eyes. How about providing something that I could see or hear that would actually indicate a god? Why does God demand faith in lieu of evidence? I think itâs not just that there is no evidence, but that the reason there isnât is because there is no god either."
"Many of the strongest proponents of climate change are now coming out and saying âitâs simply not true?â Citations please? Who were the âtopâ [ten?] proponents of anthropogenic climate change over the last decade or more? Has even one of them come out and said that itâs just not true? Because I gotta be honest here. (Someone has to be). I smell bullshit."
"If you say you believe in God, but you donât really believe in God, then how you could you possibly be trying to fool God? Wouldnât you have to believe there is a god if youâre going to try and deceive him? And what is the deception? Are you trying to trick God into thinking you believe in him? If you donât believe in God then thatâs not even possible. So already the Qurâan reveals sufficient absurdity to prove that it cannot have been authored by any god. Seriously, could this be any less ridiculous if it were written in Arabic?"
"I was a young man in the â80s, and I was into medieval weapons, Harleys and Heavy Metal. I even played D&D back when that was supposed to induct players into real-life witchcraft. So I remember all the ridiculous superstition surrounding the secret meanings of ear piercing, the pseudo-paganism of Procter & Gamble, the seemingly Satanic messages in back-masking, and the allegedly suicidal insinuations of some metal albums. I attribute a lot of that to the fact that atheism didnât have any appreciable presence back then. In those days, if you didnât buy into Christian dogma and were openly critical of it, then you were a witch. You were either a neo-pagan or (more likely) you were Satanic. The latter would be applied regardless how you might prefer to identify. To my cultural experience, there was no such thing as a skeptic as that is known today. Back then, skeptics were considered cynics who refused to open their minds. It must have been a great time for paranoid Christian conservatives. They actually like Satanists a lot more than atheists. Because Satanists not only play the Christian game; they give Christians the moral high ground. Whereas atheists piss everybody off by pointing out that it is a game and that every believer in any religion is just pretending."
"Nowhere [in the book of Genesis] does it say that the serpent was supposed to be anything but a snake. In fact nearly all of the mainstream Christian depictions of the serpent show it as a woman, allegedly Lilith, Adamâs first wife in Talmudic legend. The earliest versions of this myth, like that found in the Epic of Gilgamesh also show it to be nothing more than âthe serpent who could not be tamedâ. The serpent could not have been Satan, because it was cursed to crawl on itâs belly and eat dust for all of itâs days. Yet the first time Satan appears in subsequent scripture is some time after this story, and Satan is Godâs right-hand man then; there was never a fall-out between them. At no time is Satan ever reduced to crawling on his belly or eating dust or having his head bruised by women. There is a distinct difference in this story between the mythical character of Satan and the mythical origin of snakes."
"It is important to note that humans are a subset of apes, being members of the taxonomic superfamily Hominoidea. This is no arbitrary classification, but one that is objectively verifiable through phylogenetics. This is a fact that can be proven regardless what you would rather believe. Yet no religion either accounts for this fact nor even acknowledges it, as it stands against all their collective mythology."
"[Religion] is predominantly evil and entirely deceitful, has only negative correlations statistically, and is frequently maliciously abusive physically mentally and emotionally. It has historically always obstructed education and retarded or impeded progress in whatever application it has ever touched. All the worst atrocities in history were done in the name of religion and our greatest advances were made in opposition to it. Iâm an antitheist because religion is factually historically ethically and morally wrong."
"There are no special attributes to distinguish Christianity from any other collection of baseless lies. If there were no Christians tomorrow, weâd still have Muslims and a slough of other indefensible belief systems."
"[Religion] is literally a delusion, but one caused by conditioning rather than pathology. There are a number of studies showing a negative correlation of faith as debilitating certain areas of the brain. So religion can lead to, conceal, or even encourage mental disorders without actually being one itself."
"If you canât give me any reason to believe you, then I have no reason to believe you. Come back when you can show me youâve got something to consider."
"I like Godzilla as much as the next guy. No, I like Godzilla more than the next guy! Since I was a little kid, I watched all those absurd rubber-suit movies thinking how cool it would be if we remade Gojira as a big budget block-buster. They failed to do that in 1985, when they brought back Raymond Burr. They failed to do that in 1998, with Tristarâs GINO (Godzilla In Name Only) and Iâm sorry to say that they failed again with the latest attempt."
"Godzilla 2014 missed the mark primarily because it is not an origins story. Gojira was a monster of our own making. Similarly Gino was supposed to impose natureâs response to our meddling. But G2014 pre-existed genetic modifications and nuclear testing. We have no responsibility for him, nor the mutos either. They come from a time that never was, millions of years ago, âwhen the world was much more radioactive than it is todayâ. The story implies that mutos âeat radiationâ. In the film, they can track it through every kind of protective shielding, and they eat nuclear devices like fruit -metallic peal and all. I guess millions of years ago, nuclear missiles grew on trees, and kaiju were common even though theyâre absent from the fossil record -with only one top-secret exception. As an advocate of science education with a deep interest in paleontology, and as someone who would rather see humans held accountable for what they do to their environment, this film was very disappointing. As an atheist, it was even worse. The star of the film not only has impossible dimensions and an inexplicable power, he is also immortal. Heâs been alive forever, and spends all his time sleeping. He awakens only he senses submarines or the arrival of other kaiju, because he has a mission to protect humanity. G2014 put the âgodâ in Godzilla. The director called him a god, and some of the characters in the movie describe him as a god too. So heâs not a lizard, not a dinosaur, but one of the Lovecraftian great old ones like Cthulhu. In a video I made years ago, I too joked about Godzilla being a god. But it was still somewhat disappointing to see him depicted that way."
"Do you think it inconsistent for someone who lacks belief in the stork to object when public schools teach middle schoolers that thatâs where babies come from? Likewise no history class should ever confuse students by playing any movie with Mel Gibsonâs name in the credits, because theyâre wrong, and itâs wrong to mislead students. It would be inconsistent for one who loves and seeks knowledge of truth not to object to lies or challenge liars. Everything religion teaches is wrong. Although public schools are not teaching about the stork, some of them are teaching creationism, which is just as demonstrably absurdly wrong; In either case, itâs a criminal immoral disservice, and should be corrected."
"Asking for the meaning of life is no different than a fortune teller casting tea leaves, chicken bones, or Tarot cards, then looking at the random mess they created and wondering what that means. Abrahamic religion offers no purpose either, apart from a Stockholm syndrome, because the best you can hope for is to be imprisoned by an indomitable despot and have to press your lips to his colon for the rest of eternity âor else suffer a fate worse than death. Youâre damned if you do, damned if you donât."
"The supposedly sacred fables in the Bible describe God as creating evil intentionally, of consorting with evil, being compelled by evil, and of gambling with the devil -with human suffering as the desired outcome. In fact, God is depicted as being almost entirely evil himself, throughout the entire cluster of repugnant horror stories."
"I wasnât really a fan of kaiju, (giant Japanese monsters) only Godzilla himself. He was my hero as a boy, and even now his roar has been my only ring tone any of the cell phones I have ever had."
"Unsupported assertions of impossible absurdities are indistinguishable from the illusions of delusion, and no one should believe anything that requires faith. Because faith requires that we believe without question, without reservation, without reason. That is irrational, foolish; thatâs what a fool is. Your Bible got it wrong. Any assertion that requires faith should be rejected for that reason."
"The original 1954 Japanese film, Gojira was iconic, and only made a couple mistakes of any significance. (1)They killed him in the end, and we saw his body turned to skeleton. Not the best way to begin 60 years worth of sequels. (2) Godzilla was depicted as a dinosaur, and was associated with living trilobites. Even if there was some sort of ârealm that time forgotâ out in the Pacific somewhere, Trilobites were already extinct before the first dinosaurs, and Godzilla was clearly no dinosaur. The conceptual artists reportedly referenced illustrations of dinosaurs, but thatâs not what they rendered. All bi-pedal dinosaurs [Therapods] were digigrade, walking on their toes, like birds, and usually only three or four digits. Godzilla was plantigrade and pentadactyle, (having five digits and walking on the whole foot) just like lizards. It even looks like a lizard, apart from the fact that no reptile has an actual nose or external ears. In a sense, what Toho pictures created was actually an oriental dragon. These tend to mix reptilian and mammalian traits. Amusingly in 1954, Toho made a giant lizard and called it a dinosaur. In 1998, Tristar re-designed Godzilla as a dinosaur, but called it a lizard. Of course that wasnât the only thing Tristar did wrong. They tried to ruin the monster completely. They took away the only thing that worked in decades of sequels, the look of the monster itself. Then they took away everything that made Godzilla appealing to Kaiju fans, then they tied it down and shot it. Such disrespect. If youâre going to make a movie that already has a fan-base, and they are the ones who will decide whether your film will pay off, respect those fans and the story theyâre paying to see."
"Personally I think the only meaning your life will ever have is whatever your involvement means to someone else. The best strategy I think, if you want your life to mean something, try making someone elseâs life meaningful. But if you want your life to mean something five billion years from now, it wonât âno matter what. Sorry. But what matters now still matters now."
"There is nothing reasonable about faith. Those two words mean completely opposite things. Putting them together creates an oxymoron, Thatâs why William Lyinâ Craig thought it would make a clever book title. Faith is an unreasonable conviction which is assumed without reason and defended against all reason. Thatâs why faith is the most dishonest position it is possible to have. It really is!"
"I think that the best science fiction is where the story is fiction but the science is real, or at least as real as possible. If youâre going to write a good sci-fi, and you want me to believe the one wholly implausible idea that your story is about, then every other aspect of the film should be as seemingly reasonable as it possibly can be. Thatâs what Jurassic Park tried to do. If I am to believe that an impossibly huge reptilian monster is destroying the city, then the back story of itâs origin ought to sound realistic enough to counter-balance that. Thatâs what the first Godzilla movie tried to do. After that, filmmakers adopted the opposite strategy; so that everything else in the subsequent sequels had so many outrageous absurdities, each so insanely stupid, that the monster in the middle was the most reasonable element by comparison."
"It doesnât matter what you believe; all that matters is why you believe it, and how accurate you can show your beliefs to be."
"Religionâs preferred punishment is almost always death, regardless of the crime. But the death penalty is a statistical failure just like all their proposed solutions to other problems always are. Here in the US, the states that still have the death penalty also have the highest murder rates; its a negative correlation. The problem there is one of society, the conditions imposed and the types of responses that are culturally coaxed. When murder happens, and that person is caught and tried, we should remove them as a threat, and whether they are imprisoned, institutionalized, or what have you should be determined by the particulars in each case."
"It seems that religion only knows how to react violently, out of vengeance. Again this is because itâs a belief system rooted in dichotomy and bigotry, with little or no desire to consider extenuating circumstances and NO ability to question itself objectively."
"It doesnât matter what our out-dated, hate-filled, prejudicial doctrines and man-made mythologies might have said. There is no such thing as a âreligion of peaceâ. Religion only knows how to react violently because they donât understand reason and have never practiced tolerance. Thatâs why secular humanist diplomats will be necessary in order to end wars and other violations of human rights."
"Despite the severity of their punishments, religions have still consistently failed in virtually all attempts to curtail criminal behavior, and have in fact actually empowered or promoted criminality in many ways. More reasonable laws are usually more effective."
"How dare Huckabee say that school is where we donât want to talk about eternity, life, responsibility, or accountability. I do want to talk about those things -where religion does not. Why? Because religion offers a way to deny accountability for anything. Reverse the burden of proof. Assert as fact that which is not evidently true. Donât have a basis for any claim; assume your conclusions on the veracity of your own conviction unsupported by anything, or on citation of any false-authority whoâs comments you can present as though they agree with you. Announce in advance that you will never admit when youâre wrong; that you will continue to defend your biased preconceptions to the automatic rejection âwithout consideration- of any evidence or arguments that will ever arise to the contrary. This is what every creationist organization says in their âstatement of faithâ. Look them up. This is where they openly admit that they have no accountability."
"[The] idea of sharing the gospel with Muslims simply will not work. (1) Islam is famously strict against apostasy, and Christians influence very few from their side in any case. (2) Muslim theology is much more efficient at gaining converts. Thatâs why theyâre the fastest-growing religion, remember? More Christians turn Muslim than vice versa. (3) Christianity canât even hang onto the people they already have. Religion is not the same thing as âraceâ. You canât change your ancestors, but you can discard their traditions. Even if Christians did out-reproduce Muslims, statistics indicate that less than half of those kids would still be Christian by the time they grew up. A few might adopt some other religion; most of the rest will likely reject all religions, and that trend is rising. Therein lies the answer. You canât fight religion with religion. Everything Christians do trying to fuse church and state, all the power they give to their own faith, âwill be used to pave the way for the next dominant dogma. Every time any religion has had power to enforce their own laws, the result has invariably been a violation of human rights. The only answer âand the founding fathers said this from the beginning- is a secular government with a âwall of separationâ between church and state. Maintain that and you might keep mosque and state separate too."
"Religion doesnât solve the problem of rape at all; it exacerbates it. It should be (and in some atheist societies, it is this way) that women could walk about scantily-clad or even nude, and that men would have respect or sanity enough not to be violent against them on such paltry excuses as a lack of human decency or self control. I mean, you donât bludgeon children to death when someoneâs kid is crying loudly and annoying you, right? So why would you victimize a woman just because you find her attractive? Thatâs sick, but that is the attitude that is typically perpetuated by religion."
"Ignore for a moment the obviously sound national financial strategy behind having a competent and productive populace trained in fact-based knowledge as opposed to baseless belief with no practical application. All attempts to rid science from the lessons, to revise history, and corrupt other classes for the sake of promoting Christianity âwill only serve to empower Muslims too. The very laws and customs enabling Christians to oppress others today will also give Islam power to oppress Christians tomorrow. You canât have freedom *of* religion without freedom *from* religion, and that means keeping it out of government. So if Christians are really concerned about âIslamificationâ, then they ought to do the very opposite of everything theyâre currently doing, and rally with the atheists to stay secular."
"It just seems to me that we either have an irrational need to believe or we have a desire to understand and to improve that understanding. For those of the latter set, accuracy and accountability are paramount, but for creationists, those things donât even matter."
"When I read the gospels, I donât see a wise and benevolent sage imparting truth. I see a religious extremist and faith-healer, who is just as much of a scam artist as any of the exorcists still practicing today. Remember that Jesus taught his disciples how to do faith healing too, just like tele-evangelists still do. Jesus didnât believe in washing your hands because he didnât know about pathogens. He believed in demons instead. And he cursed a fig tree because he didnât know they were out-of-season. Likewise he didnât know that the farmers of his day already knew about other seeds that were smaller than mustard seeds. My best evidence was Jesusâ complaint that the people who knew him since childhood wouldnât buy any of his bullshit. So the only indications I had to believe in a historic Jesus were the very points that implied that he could not be a god nor have any real connection to God. So there are only two possibilities: Jesus was either an ignorant 1st century charlatan and cult leader heavily exaggerated like Robin Hood, or heâs a completely imaginary legendary figure like Hercules. Remember how Jesus said that he came not to bring peace but a sword; that he would divide husbands from their wives and children from their parents all on behalf of beliefs based on faith? Remember also that faith, (an unreasonable assertion of complete conviction which is not based on reason and is defended against all reason) âis the most dishonest position it is possible to have. Any belief which requires faith should be rejected for that reason."
"Each of the laws listed in the collection commonly and erroneously referred to as âThe Ten Commandmentsâ were either already universal ordinances everywhere, adapted from Hammurabiâs stele of law from centuries earlier, or have no parallel in American jurisprudence. The laws of Moses are NOT our laws! The founding fathers made clear who their influences really were, and that their goal was a system of government directly opposed to everything Mosaic law or governance represented. To say that the Constitution was in any way inspired by any covenant between God and Moses is no less a lie than to say that America was founded on Biblical principles -which our textbooks also say. There is no truth in either of these statements. They were inserted to revise our history according to an overt agenda to instill and perpetuate conservative Christian authority. This is a major front of the fundamentalist Christian âculture warsâ against honest, factual reality. There is no defense of these errors and no justification for imposing them as part of âeducationâ. Our textbooks are demonstrably false and deliberately misleading, and they must be corrected."
"For me to believe in God would probably require blunt force trauma to the brain, or perhaps a debilitating cognitive disorder. What would it take for you to believe that the myth of Persephone explains the seasons? Or that babies are delivered by a stork?"
"Jack Chick was a graphic artist who lived his delusional life in lies, prejudice and paranoia, promoting racist, sexist credo-specific bigotry against everyone smarter than him, or who understood things better than he did: which is pretty much everyone since he was really impressively fucking stupid -even compared to other creationists. He was so bad that Chick Publications is recognized as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. So now I hear that this creepy old dogmatic fucktard has finally stopped breathing at 92 years old. Iâm unapologetically glad about that. His death makes our world a better place. I think that everyone who believes the way that he did should show solidarity by burying their faces in the sand and holding their breath until Jack Chick breathes again. Because our world just doesnât need anyone like that -making life irritating for everyone capable of rational or compassionate thought."
"Jack Chick was one of the skid marks in the tighty-whiteys of my generation, and the world is a better place that heâs not stinking it up with his fecal fallacies anymore. Welcome to oblivion Mr Chick, where you will rot without grace in a reality that never had a god in it, and where none of your lies ever came true. The only sad part (for me) is that the moment your brain shut off, you were never able to know how wrong you were about everything you ever said. You never even had the chance to be disappointed, and are blissfully unaware of your eternal failure, you miserable awful piece of shit."
"Proving evolution wouldnât disprove God unless your god is a book. The Bible is easy to disprove, but that shouldnât be enough to disprove God. Whether God exists or not, evolution is still an inescapable fact of population genetics and the Bible is still a man-made compilation of falsified fables. Not even the existence of God could change either of these things."
"Now I would say that any honest earnest quest for truth must begin with the abandonment of faith. Are you prepared to lie in order to maintain your self-induced delusion? Or are you bold enough to question your own convictions and even test them to find out if theyâre true, and discard them if they are not? Thatâs the rift. Thatâs the difference between us."
"I am supportive of people. I am supportive of the American Dream Trump is trying to destroy. I want them to understand. Regardless of your religion, you donât get special privileges because you claim to believe something different from everybody else. You donât get special privileges because you get to claim that you believe the same things as the majority."
"Everything that we set up for legislation that will promote Christianity will only pave the way for Islam later on because it is the fastest growing religion while Christianity is in a state of decline. Demographics change; you canât fight religion with religion. What will happen is Islam will eventually dominate Christianity; there wonât be any Christians left. Fortunately, secularists, atheists, and nonbelievers are on the rise faster than even the fastest growing religion. You canât fight religion with religion, but you can fight it with reason. Thatâs what the atheist groups are really all about."
Heute, am 12. Tag schlagen wir unser Lager in einem sehr merkwĂźrdig geformten HĂśhleneingang auf. Wir sind von den Strapazen der letzten Tage sehr erschĂśpft, das Abenteuer an dem groĂen Wasserfall steckt uns noch allen in den Knochen. Wir bereiten uns daher nur ein kurzes Abendmahl und ziehen uns in unsere Kalebassen-Zelte zurĂźck. Dr. Zwitlako kann es allerdings nicht lassen, noch einige Vermessungen vorzunehmen. 2. Aug.
- Das Tagebuch
Es gab sie, mein Lieber, es gab sie! Dieses Tagebuch beweist es. Es berichtet von rätselhaften Entdeckungen, die unsere Ahnen vor langer, langer Zeit während einer Expedition gemacht haben. Leider fehlt der grĂśĂte Teil des Buches, uns sind nur 5 Seiten geblieben.
Also gibt es sie doch, die sagenumwobenen Riesen?
Weil ich so nen Rosenkohl nicht dulde!
- Zwei auĂer Rand und Band
Und ich bin sauer!