"The difficulties which so many have felt in the doctrine of Negative and Imaginary Quantities in Algebra forced themselves long ago on my attention... And while agreeing with those who had contended that negatives and imaginaries were not properly quantities at all, I still felt dissatisfied with any view which should not give to them, from the outset, a clear interpretation and meaning... It early appeared to me that these ends might be attained by our consenting to regard Algebra as being no mere Art, nor Language, nor primarily a Science of Quantity; but rather as the Science of Order in Progression. It was, however, a part of this conception, that the progression here spoken of was understood to be continuous and unidimensional: extending indefinitely forward and backward, but not in any lateral direction. And although the successive states of such a progression might (no doubt) be represented by points upon a line, yet I thought that their simple successiveness was better conceived by comparing them with moments of time, divested, however, of all reference to cause and effect; so that the "time" here considered might be said to be abstract, ideal, or pure, like that "space" which is the object of geometry. In this manner I was led, many years ago, to regard Algebra as the Science of Pure Time: and an Essay, containing my views respecting it as such, was published in 1835. ...[I]f the letters A and B were employed as dates, to denote any two moments of time, which might or might not be distinct, the case of the coincidence or identity of these two moments, or of equivalence of these two dates, was denoted by the equation,B = Awhich symbolic assertion was thus interpreted as not involving any original reference to quantity, nor as expressing the result of any comparison between two durations as measured. It corresponded to the conception of simultaneity or synchronism; or, in simpler words, it represented the thought of the present in time. Of all possible answers to the general question, "When," the simplest is the answer, "Now:" and it was the attitude of mind, assumed in the making of this answer, which (in the system here described) might be said to be originally symbolized by the equation above written."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
History of algebra
112 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by History of algebra →
Related Quotes
"All the modern higher mathematics is based on a calculus of operations, on laws of thought. All mathematics, from the…"
"The precision of statement and the facility of application which the rules of the calculus early afforded were in a m…"
"The most influential mathematics textbook of ancient times is easily named, for the Elements of Euclid has set the pa…"
"We think only through the medium of words.—Languages are true analytical methods.—Algebra, which is adapted to its pu…"
"As regards algebra, the early Arabs failed to adopt either the Diophantine or the Hindu notations. An examination of …"
"Admitting the Hindu and Alexandrian authors [such as Diophantus], to be nearly equally ancient, it must be conceded i…"
"al-Khwārizmī “not having taken algebra from the Greeks,. . . must have either invented it himself, or taken it from t…"
"My specific... object has been to contain, within the prescribed limits, the whole of the student's course, from the …"
"The following Treatise... has been endeavoured to make the theory of limits, or ultimate ratios... the sole foundatio…"
"I have decided first to consider the majority of the authors who up to now have written about [algebra], so that I ca…"