"A later court judgment of the British era in 1937 speaks about this episode and why it might have been downplayed by Muslim court chroniclers: If this story [of draught and rain] is true, then it established the efficacy of Hindu worship and of mantras, and therefore, it is possible that the Muslim historians may not have narrated this fact. The indifference of the Hindus to write history in those and previous day[s] is proverbial. However, it is a historical fact that Akbar permitted the construction and re-construction of temples, generally so even if no permission was given by him, then too it is not improbable that this temple might have been reconstructed during his times, and the Hindus of that and subsequent times might have concocted the story that the temple was reconstructed with the permission of Akbar so that the Muslim in subsequent times may not demolish it."