Pell's equation

"Florian Cajori, the noted historian, summed up the matter in an extraordinarily suggestive manner: The perversity of fate has willed it that the equation y2 = nx2 + 1 should now be called Pell’s Problem, while in recognition of Brahmin scholarship it ought to be called the “Hindu Problem.” It is a problem that has exercised the highest faculties of some of our greatest modern analysts. Indian mathematical historians would like to call it the Brahmagupta–Bhaskara problem, keeping in mind that Bhaskar perfected Brahmagupta’s method of solution in the twelfth century; Bhaskara used “Chakravala”, or a cyclic process, to improve Brahmagupta’s method by doing away with the necessity of finding a trial solution."

"‘[…] his correspondence with Digby, and, through Digby, with the English mathematicians WALLIS and BROUCKNER occupies the next year and a half, from January 1657 to June 1658. It begins with a challenge to Wallis and Brouckner, but at the same time also to Frenicle, Schooten “and all others in Europe” to solve a few problems, with special emphasis upon what later became known (through a mistake of Euler’s) as “Pell’s equation”. What would have been Fermat’s astonishment if some missionary, just back from India, had told him that his problem had been successfully tackled there by native mathematicians almost six centuries earlier!’"

"‘[…] the chakravala method anticipated the European methods by more than a thousand years. But, as we have seen, no European performances in the whole field of algebra at a time much later than Bhaskara’s, nay nearly up to our times, equalled the marvellous complexity and ingenuity of chakravala.’"

"This method is supreme above all praise; it is certainly the finest thing accomplished in number theory before Lagrange."