"Here is what I think was very valuable in Feyerabend’s analysis, both as conducted in Philosophy of Nature and elsewhere in his writings. He was an iconoclast who was not afraid to think outside the box, way outside the box. And his criticism of science as a potentially dehumanizing (“alienating”) enterprise that lends itself to power games and ideological exploitation was right on the mark. He anticipated the modern phenomenon of scientism. It takes some serious intellectual guts to write a book like Philosophy of Nature, where one presents a sweeping rethinking of the entire history of Western philosophy and science, and — again — I’m glad I read the book. But Feyerabend seems to be perversely blind to some obvious answers to his own questions. At some point he claims that it is hard to fathom why Aristotelian physics gave out to its Galileian and Newtonian successor. Well, because Galileo and Newton were much closer than Aristotle to understanding how the world actually works, not to mention being able to make accurate experimental predictions."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Philosophers from AustriaAcademics from AustriaPeople from ViennaSociologists from AustriaUniversity of California, Berkeley faculty
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Massimo Pigliucci, "Book club: Philosophy of Nature, ch. 6" (February 20, 2017)
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Paul_Karl_Feyerabend
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Paul Karl Feyerabend
Paul Feyerabend (January 13, 1924 – February 11, 1994) was a philosopher of science, professor of philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, who became famous for his purportedly anarchistic view of science, his bitingly critical prose on the prevailing scientific philosophies, and his rejection of the existence of universal methodological rules.
82 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Paul Karl Feyerabend →
Related Quotes
"Not only are facts and theories in constant disharmony, they are never as neatly separated as everyone makes them out…"
"Taking experimental results and observations for granted and putting the burden of proof on the theory means taking t…"
"No single theory ever agrees with all the facts in its domain"
"[Responding to criticism from Dr. Hesse] Voodoo, Dr Hesse's piece de risistance', is case in point. Nobody knows it, …"
"Facts are constituted by older ideologies, and a clash between facts and theories may be proof of progress."
"The material which a scientist actually has at his disposal, his laws, his experimental results, his mathematical tec…"
"The validity of usefulness, adequacy of popular standards can be tested only by research that violates them."
"[continued conjecture on empiricism] At this point an "empirical" theory of the kind described becomes almost indisti…"
"Progress was often achieved by a "criticism from the past"… After Aristotle and Ptolemy, the idea that the earth move…"
"Now - how can we possibly examine something we use all the time and presuppose in every statement? How can we critici…"