"Combining this observation with the insight that science has no special method, we arrive at the result that the separation of science and non-science is not only artificial but also detrimental to the advancement of knowledge. If we want to understand nature, if we want to master our physical surroundings, then we must use all ideas, all methods, and not just a small selection of them. The assertion, however, that there is no knowledge outside science - extra scientiam nulla salus - is nothing but another and most convenient fairy-tale. Primitive tribes has more detailed classifications of animals and plant than contemporary scientific zoology and botany, they know remedies whose effectiveness astounds physicians (while the pharmaceutical industry already smells here a new source of income), they have means of influencing their fellow men which science for a long time regarded as non-existent (voodoo), they solve difficult problems in ways which are still not quite understood (building of the pyramids; Polynesian travels), there existed a highly developed and internationally known astronomy in the old Stone Age, this astronomy was factually adequate as well as emotionally satisfying, it solved both physical and social problems (one cannot say the same about modern astronomy) and it was tested in very simple and ingenious ways (stone observatories in England and in the South Pacific; astronomical schools in Polynesia - for a more details treatment an references concerning all these assertions cf. my Einfuhrung in die Naturphilosophie). There was the domestication of animals, the invention of rotating agriculture, new types of plants were bred and kept pure by careful avoidance of cross fertilization, we have chemical inventions, we have a most amazing art that can compare with the best achievement of the present. True, there were no collective excursions to the moon, but single individuals, disregarding great dangers to their soul and their sanity, rose from sphere to sphere to sphere until they finally faced God himself in all His splendor while others changed into animals and back into humans again. At all times man approached his surroundings with wide open senses and a fertile intelligence, at all times he made incredible discoveries, at all times we can learn from his ideas."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Philosophers from AustriaAcademics from AustriaPeople from ViennaSociologists from AustriaUniversity of California, Berkeley faculty
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Pg. 306-307
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Paul_Karl_Feyerabend
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Paul Karl Feyerabend
Paul Feyerabend (January 13, 1924 – February 11, 1994) was a philosopher of science, professor of philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, who became famous for his purportedly anarchistic view of science, his bitingly critical prose on the prevailing scientific philosophies, and his rejection of the existence of universal methodological rules.
82 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Paul Karl Feyerabend →
Related Quotes
"Not only are facts and theories in constant disharmony, they are never as neatly separated as everyone makes them out…"
"Taking experimental results and observations for granted and putting the burden of proof on the theory means taking t…"
"No single theory ever agrees with all the facts in its domain"
"[Responding to criticism from Dr. Hesse] Voodoo, Dr Hesse's piece de risistance', is case in point. Nobody knows it, …"
"Facts are constituted by older ideologies, and a clash between facts and theories may be proof of progress."
"The material which a scientist actually has at his disposal, his laws, his experimental results, his mathematical tec…"
"The validity of usefulness, adequacy of popular standards can be tested only by research that violates them."
"[continued conjecture on empiricism] At this point an "empirical" theory of the kind described becomes almost indisti…"
"Progress was often achieved by a "criticism from the past"… After Aristotle and Ptolemy, the idea that the earth move…"
"Now - how can we possibly examine something we use all the time and presuppose in every statement? How can we critici…"