"Political necessities of the Indians during the last phase of British rule underlined the importance of alliance between the two communities, and this was sought to be smoothly brought about by glossing over the differences and creating' an imaginary history of the past in order to depict the relations between the two in a much more favourable light than it actually was. Eminent Hindu political leaders even went so far as to proclaim that the Hindus were not at all a subject race during the Muslim rule. These absurd notions, which would have been laughed at by Indian leaders at the beginning of the nineteenth century, passed current as history owing to the exigencies of the political complications at the end of that century. Unfortunately slogans and beliefs die hard, and even today, for more or less the same reasons as before, many Indians, specially Hindus, are peculiarly sensitive to any comments or observations even made in course of historical writings, touching upon the communal relations in any way. A fear of wounding the susceptibilities of the sister community haunts the minds of Hindu politicians and historians, and not only prevents them from speaking out the truth, but also brings down their wrath upon those who have the courage to do so. But history is no respecter of persons or communities, and must always strive to tell the truth, so far as it can be deduced from reliable evidence. This great academic principle has a bearing upon actual life, for ignorance seldom proves to be a real bliss either to an individual or to a nation. In the particular case under consideration, ignorance of the actual relation between the Hindus and the Muslims throughout the course of history,—an ignorance deliberately encouraged by some,—may ultimately be found to have been the most important single factor which led to the partition of India. The real and effective means of solving a problem is to know and understand the facts that gave rise to it, and not to ignore them by hiding the head, ostrich-like, into sands of fiction."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
RC Majumdar, Volume 6: The Delhi Sultanate [1300-1526] (p. xxix.)
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Hindu%E2%80%93Islamic_relations
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Hindu–Islamic relations
114 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Hindu–Islamic relations →
Related Quotes
"Whenever the Muharram… chances to coincide with Hindu festivals, such as the Ramnavmi or the birth of Rama, the Chara…"
"If the kings of Islam, with all their majesty and power, take for granted infidelity and infidels, polytheism and pol…"
"Mahmud utterly ruined the prosperity of the country, and performed there wonderful exploits, by which the Hindus beca…"
"Hindu sciences have retired far away from those parts of the country conquered by us, and have fled to places which o…"
"They [Hindus] totally differ from us in religion, as we believe in nothing in which they believe, and vice versa.… Th…"
"[The Vijayanagar kings allowed] that every man may come and go, and live according to his own creed without suffering…"
"A European traveller named Barbosa who observed goings-on in Vijayanagara described the king as allowing great freedo…"
"The Brahmans, says Ibn Batitah, “are revered by the infidels and inspire hatred in the Muslims” (p. 188)."
"[In the original edition of the novel Sitaram, the Fakir says:] Son, I hear that you have come to found a Hindu domin…"
"As early as in the time of Sultan Iltutmish (1210-1236), soon after the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate in 1206,…"