"Giving oneself as something that feels means asking that the substances that make up the partner's body be mixed with one's own, creating a single extension in which one travels for hours, for days. Taking something that feels means asking that one's clothes be accepted everywhere and always, to the point of not being recognized either by oneself or by one's partner as belonging to anyone. Thus, the difference between giving and taking falls away. (p. 13)"
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Imported from EN Wikiquote
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Mario_Perniola
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Mario Perniola
Mario Perniola (20 May 1941 – 9 January 2018) was an Italian philosopher, professor of aesthetics and author.
37 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Mario Perniola →
Related Quotes
"There is a secret in communication: it consists in making oneself invisible through excessive exposure. (p. 13)"
"Be wary, therefore, of those who cry out that the world is neither rational nor moral, because either they are ineffe…"
"The purpose of communication is to encourage the elimination of all certainty and to acknowledge an anthropological t…"
"It seems that our age has exercised its power precisely on the level of feeling. Therefore, perhaps it could be defin…"
"Apollonian infallibility presupposes self-control: the shot is all the more perfect the steadier the archer's hand, t…"
"To love is to give freely, but not harmlessly. It is impossible to explain why its object is one human being and not …"
"Media populism does not build community or togetherness; on the contrary, it maximizes exclusion and rejection. But t…"
"‘Politically correct’ is based on claiming the status of victim: weakness is not thought of as something that must be…"
"Fragmentary experience is in reality an experience of the absolute: it transcends even poetry and only in love does i…"
"Hans Urs von Balthasar is the only one in our century to have raised the question of the essential “form” of Catholic…"