"Keynesian economics is the economics of nominal rigidities basically, nominal rigidities everywhere. Fully anticipated money does affect output. Everybody can see that! So, it's right. The fact that it's not as theoretically tidy as Lucas's 1972 Journal of Economic Theory paper is not a reason to throw it away. That's become a minority view in this profession, unfortunately. It wouldn't have been in the '60s."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Imported from EN Wikiquote
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Conversations_with_Economists
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Conversations with Economists
17 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Conversations with Economists →
Related Quotes
"Herbert A. Simon... was rightly complaining about some, if not a lot, of the economic literature at the time that he …"
"Some of the new classical economists are extremely ideological. If you give them evidence, for example, that fully an…"
"Another big influence was Samuelson's Foundations, which I read when I stated here at Chicago. It's a "how-to-do-it" …"
"The hypothesis was more or less buried during the '60s. Arrow used it in his paper on learning-by-doing in the '60s. …"
"The only way I feel I understand something is if I can write it down in a model and make it work. I felt that from th…"
"Herbert A. Simon... used to give us a hard time. He likes to take on the devil's advocate role. In his Sciences of th…"
"I do not consider the term "Keynesian revolution" appropriate. [...] It seemed to be a more political event than a sc…"
"If you look back at the 1929 to 1933 episode, there were a lot of decisions made that, after the fact, people wished …"
"I think that Keynes was certainly a good example of a new paradigm. His work is possibly the best example of a case f…"
"Macro rational expectations, as I have labeled the hypothesis, seems to say that expectations in an economist's model…"