September 11

"2 Jeff Q (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC). I respect Amis, but I just don't feel this has the impact expected of a "9/11" quote."

"3 InvisibleSun 17:00, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"

"2 hydnjo talk 17:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC). If there are no words for 9/11 then we're in real trouble when the really bad happens."

"2 hydnjo talk 17:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC). A bit idealistic at the beginning which dampens the ending punch. -->"

"1 3~ Kalki 21:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC) Though I totally agree with the observation, I would prefer to use this on another anniversary, such as that of the Trinity tests (16 July), or the Hiroshima bombing (6 August). ~ Kalki 15:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"

"3 -4- hydnjo talk 13:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"

"3 ~ Jeff Q (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"

"2 InvisibleSun 17:00, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"

"1 Zarbon 22:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC) -->"

"3 Zarbon 20:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)"

"3 Kalki 13:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC) with a strong lean toward 4, but I would trim it to simply begin at "On September 11, 2001, the world fractured..." -->"

"1 Zarbon 17:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC) -->"

"2 3~ Kalki 21:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC) there remains a mixture of validity and irony in this statement, but I am less inclined than previously to use it, because the ironies clearly have become stronger. ~ Kalki 15:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"

"3 User:Warrior-Poet 10 September, 2005 10:25(CST)"

"1 hydnjo talk 13:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"

"1 ~ Jeff Q (talk) 14:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)"

"1 22:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:08, 31 August 2012 (UTC)3 Kalki (talk · contributions) 10:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC) with a very strong lean toward 4. -->"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 07:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC) 3 Kalki 00:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC) 3 Kalki 00:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC) but would now extend this to the entire first paragraph of the novel:"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC) 3 Kalki 00:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."

"This unsigned proposal was made by"

"0 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 07:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC) 1 Kalki 23:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC) this might be acceptable as a QOTD on a date related to Maher, but I do not consider it an acceptable QOTD for any anniversary of the attack. ~ ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 07:11, 5 September 2013 (UTC)"

"2 Zarbon 22:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)"

"4 Putting things into context, if the Americans in the Revolution had done the same in order to win, we would be celebrating their Bravery --JayStander 02:34, 4 September 2008 (UTC)"

"2 Kalki 00:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)"

"3 because fighting for the sake of fighting alone is a waste. Zarbon 04:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"

"1 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"

"3 because it takes courage to assume responsibility. Zarbon 04:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"

"1 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC) with a lean toward 2."

"3 because talking alone will not solve problems, actions sometimes speak louder than words. Zarbon 04:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"

"3 because a battle against terrorism is one that the entire planet is fighting. Zarbon 04:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"

"2 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"

"3 bystander (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC) with a lean to 4"

"4 because a terrorist has no loyalty to any land and absolutely no loyalty to any people. Zarbon 04:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)"

"1 because when I read the quote I get the sense that it can too easily be taken multiple ways. It can be saying that terrorists are people who fight only for themselves and their own greed, which I think is the speaker being a bit presumptuous or it can mean that terrorists are not all fighting for one country or one cause insinuating that fighting one country or cause won't get rid of them. --JayStander 07:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)"

"1 Kalki (talk · contributions) 19:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC) * 2 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"

"1 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Needs better sourcing"

"2 Zarbon 22:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"

"3 Kalki 13:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC) * 4 Kalki 22:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."

"1 Zarbon 22:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC)"

"2.5 Ningauble 00:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC) (with apologies for nominating a pun)"

"2 Zarbon 17:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)"

"2 Kalki 16:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)"

"3 Artofwar"

"2 Kalki 02:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)"

"3 tab1of2 23:11, 1 September 2010 (EST)"

"2 Kalki (talk · contributions) 19:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)"

"improperly placed on page as if it were 2011 selection on 2011·09·13 by IP"

"1 Kalki (talk · contributions) 23:23, 13 September 2011 (UTC) acceptable as a suggestion, but have no real interest in using this as QOTD."