October 4

"3 Denji 12:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC)"

"2 Kalki 19:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)"

"2 InvisibleSun 23:14, 3 October 2008 (UTC) -->"

"4 Kalki 21:55, 3 October 2009 (UTC) * 3 Kalki 00:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC) but would probably prefer to trim the final "How is this?" as unnecessary."

"1 Zarbon 17:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC) -->"

"3 N6n 14:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC) -->"

"1 Zarbon 22:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)"

"3 //Gbern3 (talk) 03:28, 16 August 2013 (UTC) -->"

"1 //Gbern3 (talk) 03:28, 16 August 2013 (UTC) -->"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 22:55, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 3 Kalki 00:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC) with a strong lean toward 4. but would extend this for context to read:"

"1 //Gbern3 (talk) 03:28, 16 August 2013 (UTC) I don't get it. -->"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 23:53, 3 October 2018 (UTC) 3 Kalki 00:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC) with a lean toward 4."

"2 //Gbern3 (talk) 03:28, 16 August 2013 (UTC) -->"

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 00:14, 4 October 2019 (UTC) 3 Kalki 19:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC) with a strong lean toward 4."

"4 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 00:05, 4 October 2022 (UTC) -->; recent remarks on responses to Hurricane Ian."

"4 because the underdog will always be protected by law and this is a great description of that defense, beautifully and morally personified by the snake and the mouse. Zarbon 05:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)"

"1 Kalki 21:55, 3 October 2009 (UTC) * 2 Kalki 19:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC) the quote itself is acceptable, but I am not sure of the context in which Kaltenrunner is using this assertion, and feel uneasy giving it anything more than a 1 until I know more about this."

"2 I am all for it as long as the talk is only of something looking "justified" or not -- wallow in sentimentality for all I care. But I am against Law entering the issue. N6n 14:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)"

"3 ♞☤☮♌︎Kalki ⚚⚓︎⊙☳☶⚡ 13:36, 1 October 2014 (UTC)"