"The reason is that the second order properties induced by similar general equilibrium models are, in general, so different from those of actual data that some authors (e.g. Campbell and Shiller 1987, Frankel and Froot 1987) have concluded that the simple version of the rational expectations-efficient market hypothesis is severely flawed."
Quote Details
Added by wikiquote-import-bot
Unverified quote
0 likes
Original Language: English
Available Languages (1)
Sources
Fabio Canova. "Sensitivity analysis and model evaluation in simulated dynamic general equilibrium economies." International Economic Review (1995): 477-501.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Rational_expectations
Revision History
No revisions have been submitted for this quote.
Categories
Rational expectations
37 quotes on TrueQuotesView all quotes by Rational expectations →
Related Quotes
"Using the popular macroeconomic models of the time, Lucas and Sargent showed how replacing traditional assumptions ab…"
"So monetary policy decisions tend to regress toward the mean and to be inertial—and hence biased in just the same way…"
"Most mainstream macroeconomic theoretical innovations since the 1970s (the New Classical rational expectations revolu…"
"Its development of Mises’s theory of action anticipated much of the rational expectations idea that would later win R…"
"The current macroeconometrics literature has proposed two ways to confront general equilibrium rational expectations …"
"The Keynesian econometric methodology developed by Klein and associates was criticized by Lucas in his 1976 “Critique…"
"The rational expectations revolution of the 1970s threw out the textbook Keynesian apparatus because it did not cope …"
"In the early 1970s,... economists began to embrace the Rational Expectations Hypothesis (REH), according to which mar…"
"Nonetheless, as Paul Krugman’s popular writings have indicated,economists’ confidence in their ability to guide the e…"
"One troublesome aspect is the place of rational expectations macroeconomics in the often political debate over Keynes…"