University of Edinburgh faculty

120 quotes found

"Black discovered the difference between weak and strong s, i.e. between the alkali s and s. The work... is essentially quantitative, and... leads into... gas analysis, which was to play a very important role in providing a new chemical theory. ...Black ...first showed that and were two different substances. Although both effervesce when treated with s... [m]agnesium carbonate does not form common lime when heated strongly, and on cooling, the residue is insoluble in water. This product of ignition (oxide) however forms the same salts with acids as does the original salt (carbonate) with the difference that no effervescence occurs. Black also observed that during ignition "air" () is lost, and supposed that to be responsible for the loss of weight as well as for the effervescence... [H]e dissolved the magnesium oxide in sulphuric acid and then precipitated the magnesium with . ...[T]he composition of the precipitate was identical with that... before the ignition... He... concluded that alkali carbonates were not elemental substances, as had been originally thought, because they give "air" to the... oxide... [the] same "air"... responsible for the effervescence... Black then [examined] lime and limestone and applied similar experiments. He established that the air was not identical with atmospheric air... only a component... called by Black "fixed air"... that part... absorbed by lime and the alkali hyroxides. ...[T]he relationship... is similar to that between alkalis and acids... alkalis are "in some measure neutralized" by the fixed air. However, the relation between acids and alkalis is stronger as the acid drives out the fixed air."

- Joseph Black

0 likesUniversity of Edinburgh facultyChemists from ScotlandPhysicists from ScotlandPeople from BordeauxUniversity of Edinburgh alumni
"Circles are the only curvilineal plane figures considered in the elements of geometry. If they could have allowed... these as similar polygons of an infinite number of sides (as some have done who pretend to abridge their demonstrations), after proving that any similar polygons inscribed in circles are in the duplicate ratio of the diameters, they would have immediately extended this to the circles themselves and would have considered the second proposition of the twelfth book of the Elements as an easy corollary from the first. But there is ground to think that they would not have admitted a demonstration of this kind. It was a fundamental principle with them, that the difference of any two unequal quantities, by which the greater exceeds the lesser, may be added to itself till it shall exceed any proposed finite quantity of the same kind: and that they founded their propositions concerning curvilineal figures upon this principle... is evident from the demonstrations, and from the express declaration of Archimedes, who acknowledges it to be the foundation...[of] his own discoveries, and cites it as assumed by the antients in demonstrating all their propositions of this kind. But this principle seems to be inconsistent with... admitting... an infinitely little quantity or difference, which, added to itself any number of times, is never supposed to become equal to any finite quantity whatsoever."

- Colin Maclaurin

0 likesFellows of the Royal SocietyMathematicians from ScotlandUniversity of Edinburgh facultyUniversity of Glasgow alumniUniversity of Aberdeen faculty
"He [Kepler] supposes, in that treatise [epitome of astronomy], that the motion of the sun on his axis is preserved by some inherent vital principle; that a certain virtue, or immaterial image of the sun, is diffused with his rays into the ambient spaces, and, revolving with the body of the sun on his axis, takes hold of the planets and carries them along with it in the same direction; as a load-stone turned round in the neighborhood of a magnetic needle makes it turn round at the same time. The planet, according to him, by its inertia endeavors to continue in its place, and the action of the sun's image and this inertia are in a perpetual struggle. He adds, that this action of the sun, like to his light, decreases as the distance increases; and therefore moves the same planet with greater celerity when nearer the sun, than at a greater distance. To account for the planet's approaching towards the sun as it descends from the aphelium to the perihelium, and receding from the sun while it ascends to the aphelium again, he supposes that the sun attracts one part of each planet, and repels the opposite part; and that the part which is attracted is turned towards the sun in the descent, and that the other part is towards the sun in the ascent. By suppositions of this kind he endeavored to account for all the other varieties of the celestial motions."

- Colin Maclaurin

0 likesFellows of the Royal SocietyMathematicians from ScotlandUniversity of Edinburgh facultyUniversity of Glasgow alumniUniversity of Aberdeen faculty
"2. Sir Isaac Newton's Rules, in his ', concerning the Resolution of the higher Equations, and the Affectations of their Roots, being, for the most part, delivered without any Demonstration, Mr. MacLaurin had designed, that his Treatise should serve as a Commentary on that Work. For we here find all those difficult Passages in Sir Isaac's Book, which have so long perplexed the Students of Algebra, clearly explained and demonstrated. How much such a Commentary was wanted, we may learn from the Words of the late eminent Author.The ablest Mathematicians of the last Age (says he) did not disdain to write Notes on the Geometry of Des Cartes; and surely Sir Isaac Newton's Arithmetic no less deserves that Honour. To excite some one of the many skilful Hands that our Times afford to undertake this Work, and to shew the Necessity of it, I give this Specimen, in an Explication of two Passages of the '; which, however, are not the most difficult in that Book.What this learned Professor so earnestly wished for, we at last see executed; not separately nor in the loose disagreeable Form which such Commentaries generally take, but in a Manner equally natural and convenient; every Demonstration being aptly inserted into the Body of the Work, as a necessary and inseparable Member; an Advantage which, with some others, obvious enough to an attentive Reader, will, 'tis hoped, distinguish this Performance from every other, of the Kind, that has hitherto appeared."

- Colin Maclaurin

0 likesFellows of the Royal SocietyMathematicians from ScotlandUniversity of Edinburgh facultyUniversity of Glasgow alumniUniversity of Aberdeen faculty
"In sum, however, the evidence from Baluchistan and from Sind and the Punjab is reasonably consistent in implying that at some period likely to have been before 1500 BCE (to use a convenient round figure), the long-established cultural traditions of North-Western India were rudely and ruthlessly interrupted by the arrival of a new people from the west. The burning of Baluchi villages and the equipment of the graves at Sahi Tump suggest that these new arrivals were predominantly conquerors who traveled light and adopted the pottery of the region in which they established themselves. In Sind, at Chanhudaro, a barbarian settlement appears [evidently the reference is to the Jhukar Culture] in the deserted ruins of the Harappan town, and here some local craftsmen may have remained to work for their alien masters, while the pottery suggests a resurgence of local, non-Harappan elements. At Mohenjo-daro, it seems clear that the civilization that had survived so long was already effete and on the wane when the raiders came, and at Harappa we know from the evidence of the rebuilding of the Citadel walls that the inhabitants were on the defensive in the last days of the city, though, these precautionary measures did not suffice to keep away the intruders, wherever they came from, who afterwards settled on the ruins and buried their dead in Cemetery H for generations."

- Stuart Piggott

0 likesArchaeologists from the United KingdomFellows of the British AcademyUniversity of Edinburgh faculty